One less festering sore on the backside of humanity:
Florida sex offender, 33, on the run after shooting sheriff’s deputy during traffic stop is killed by homeowner as he tried to break into his house just one day later.
LOL… he tried to break into a house in Dixie County?
Today’s Roundup is brought to you by:
And all in that vein, so to speak:
…even worse is that he complained that “she just lay there”.
And another negrophiliac:
…incel desperation knows no racial boundaries.
…proving once again that vaping can cause kids to be corrupted.
…ummm Lizzo, honey…
…okay, the pichers:
…proving that women can have as bad taste as men can in their choice of partners.
…yeah yeah I know, more pichers:
And for some unknown reason, all the guys just wanna poke her. Sad.
Finally, speaking of poking:
…of course, her body looks nothing like Rihanna’s, but whatever. (No link because eeek.)
Your suggestions in Comments.
…as the Ukraine government belatedly realizes:
The Ukrainian government will give weapons ” to anyone who wants to defend the country”, it has said, in the aftermath of Russia expanding its war in the country’s eastern territory.
Amid reserve forces being mobilised and sent to fight the expanding Russian occupation of Ukraine’s eastern territories, the Kyiv government is taking steps to dramatically increase the supply of available fighters, promising to hand weapons to anyone willing to take up arms in defence of the nation. Joining the resistance is simple too, the government says — all you need is your passport and a willingness to fight.
Says it all, really. And it’s not even “well regulated”:
Yesterday, Ukraine’s parliament passed a bill considerably liberalising ownership of firearms for civilians and making explicitly clear this change in law was in response to the dangers the country faced. As reported, the bill “establishes the basic rights and responsibilities of individuals”, liberalises ownership, but also “increases the responsibility for their illegal use”.
Yeah, it used to be almost impossible for Ukrainian citizens to legally own guns. Funny how that works, innit?
The Department of Defense (DOD) said that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin approved the deployments of the guards, which had been requested by the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and U.S. Capitol Police (USCP).
“The people who live, work and visit the District are part of our community, and their safety is our first mission priority,” Maj. Gen. Sherrie L. McCandless, D.C. National Guard commanding general, said in a statement to news outlets.
Sure sound nervous about a bunch of truckers, don’t they? Oh wait:
“Our MPD and USCP partners have asked for our help in ensuring people can demonstrate peacefully and safely, and we stand ready to assist.”
Oh, so they’re going to guarantee the safety of the protesting truckers, are they? Against whom, precisely? BLM? Zombies? Militant vegans?
Fucking lying bastards.
And since when was the National Guard a “partner” to law enforcement? (I know, since forever, never mind that pesky Posse Comitatus thing.)
Anyway, here’s the tally:
The approval will enable around 400 D.C. National Guard members to “provide support at designated traffic posts, provide command and control, and cover sustainment requirements.”
“Sustainment”? Getting food and such to the protesters?
Guards deployed to the area will not be armed and will not help with law enforcement or carry out domestic surveillance activities.
Pull the other one. Fool me once, etc.
Austin also approved USCP’s request for assistance for up to 300 National Guard troops from outside the Washington area to help at certain traffic posts and Capitol entry points, Breitbart reports. That will begin later than 7 a.m., on Saturday, February 26, according to Breitbart, who note that 50 large tactical vehicles will also be placed at designated traffic posts on a 24-hour basis in the area.
“50 large tactical vehicles”, eh? And their purpose is… what, exactly? How about this:
Police around DC area have told the [National] Guard that the trucker convoy intends to shut down the [DC] Beltway and major roads leading in and out of DC. The Guard is scrambling to secure heavy tow trucks to haul away semis which may try to block roads.
My question (and it’s a serious one): Are the feds trying to provoke a confrontation?
The evidence seems to support that they are.
Here’s an interesting story:
Anonymous British woman asks if she is being unreasonable to think her partner should be helping her with finances at a time where she is struggling.
In her post, she explained that although she is normally financially stable, she has had a difficult time while waiting to be paid for a job she did a few months ago. She’s eaten through her savings and is relying on credit cards – all while her partner has just come into a huge sum of money. After inheriting £500,000, she expected her boyfriend to offer to help with her finances to allow her to afford food.
She explained that they’ve been together for two years and don’t live in the same house, but that he’s told her she’s his ‘life partner’.
Key word here: “boyfriend”. He doesn’t owe her anything, although on a personal note, I think he’s being a complete asshole.
Still, he is already supporting his own child (by another woman, ex-wife?), so maybe he’s just being wary — and in these modern times, who can blame him?
I think she should dump his worthless ass out in the street — how much worse can her predicament get if he’s not helping her out anyway?
And we’ve all been there, waiting to get paid while an erstwhile client’s accounting department waits and waits to pay their bills, thinking that this makes them heroes to management. This bullshit cost me most of my gun collection several years ago, and thank gawd I had the guns to sell because otherwise I’d have been living in my car, assuming I could have kept up the payments on that, too. (The amounts were significant, by the way: I had a monthly nut of about $4,500, and this one single account payable was about $27,000; hence, I think, the client’s shenanigans. Quick to spend, slow to pay, the bastards.)
All round, it’s a lousy situation.
