…what the WHPC shooter’s motives were, according to that lying sack of shit Obama:
“Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night’s shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, it’s incumbent upon us all to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy.”
Yeah, apart from the scrote’s actual published words, that is. The guy could have been carrying a handwritten, signed note in his pocket saying “I want to kill Trump!” and I bet Obama would still have said the same thing, the mealymouthed little motherfucker.
It’s always about “plausible deniability” with these socialist scumbags, isn’t it?
Here’s how I see it. There are two sets of “motives” with all these so-called “random shooters”. The first set of motives is the obvious ones, e.g. what he himself said his motives were.
The second set of motives is what I referred to in last week’s post about the Anarchists’ Playbook:
All these “Ego” Anarchists had responded to the principle of Anarchy — “The Idea”, as Barbara Tuchman described it in the Proud Tower — and its primary focus was on destruction of a state or institution, perpetrated by a lone individual guided by near-insanity or else a mind infused with hatred for “the System” and its leaders.
We’re seeing it now, all over again: Charlie Kirk of Turning Point, assassinated by Tyler Robinson; Brian Thompson of United Healthcare, assassinated by Luigi Mangione, and various other such attempted assassinations.
…and now we can add this latest little turd to the file of “attempted assassinations”.
Barack Obama and his merry little band of Commies can bleat all they want about unknown motives, but they are flat-out lying. They know all too well what these motives are because they’re encouraging them, they and their little lickspittles in the media and academia.
I need to quit now before I’m accused of suggesting that Obama et al. should be dragged up the gallows stairs for being guilty of fomenting insurrection and assassinations.
