The irony of this would have escaped the “Democrats” in Congress:
…consistency not being a noted trait among Marxists, hypocrisy ditto.
Category: Marxists
Amateur Hour
I suppose that we should be grateful that this latest Leon Czolgosz-wannabe wasn’t as well prepared as he should have been. Clearly, he went straight to the “Suggested Assassin’s Weapons” tab at Amazon or something — that is to say, he got some things quite right, and a lot of other things very wrong. Consider this series of pics of his “arsenal” which he hoped to use at the Hilton D.C.:
Okay, let’s look at this “arsenal”.
- Pump shotgun: Yes of course. If you’re going for “maximum damage in a confined area”, there are few better choices. One might argue that a semi-auto would be a better choice, but potato-potahto.
- Colt 1911 model: Also a solid choice for a handgun, although he may have been better off with one of those guns which carry a 500-round magazine, e.g. a Glock. Still, the chances of him getting to actually use a handgun (any handgun) during a mass shooting are going to be minimal, unless the 1911 is backup for when you run out of 12ga ammo. But:
- Knives (4, assassin for the use of): Four knives? For a gunfight? Okay, by all means carry a knife as part of your EDC accoutrements (I do), but let’s be honest about this: in his proposed scenario, a knife — any knife, let alone four — will be about as useful as a golf club, maybe less so. And: two throwing knives? Useless; toss them for a couple spare magazines (which you are going to need if shooting a 1911; ask me how I know this.) Also, a Ka-Bar is too unwieldy; that boot knife (which I carry when wearing cowboy boots) would be the only decent option here.
I still think that the Secret Service missed a trick by not shooting the asshole dead on the spot, but that’s just me. Given how inept the SS have been with their handguns in the past, however, subduing the scrote might have been the better option; at least there was no collateral damage.
Because Of Course It’s The Guns
Here we go again:
Forty-five years ago, John Hinckley Jr attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan as he left the Hilton hotel in Washington, injuring the US president and three others. Obsessed with the actor Jodie Foster, and seeking to gain her attention, the shooter had initially pursued Reagan’s Democratic predecessor, Jimmy Carter.
On Saturday night, the hotel again rang to shots as it hosted the annual White House correspondents’ dinner. Tuxedo-clad politicians and journalists dived under tables as bangs were heard from the lobby, and Donald Trump was rushed from the stage. A secret service agent was shot, though saved by his ballistics vest. The echoes of the 1981 attack are a potent reminder that violence has long been a tragic strand of the American political tradition. Gun violence is grimly familiar. This does not diminish the seriousness of an incident that was widely and rightly condemned. Rather, it highlights its importance. …
The shooting also demonstrates once more the calamitous effect of gun culture. The US has 120 firearms for every 100 residents. While shooting homicides fell last year, on average they killed 40 people each day. A 2024 study by the violence research programme at the University of California, Davis suggested that many recent firearms purchasers were open to political violence.
Well, it’s The Guardian (no link because fukkem) so let me just address a few of the fallacies therein.
Let’s start with “the calamitous effect of gun culture.” The really calamitous effects of an unarmed citizenry (the opposite of a gun culture) is when the government starts the wholesale massacre or imprisonment of its citizens. To use but two such examples, we have the Soviet Union in the 1930s and the Cambodian killing fields of the 1980s. Of course, the fucking Guardian isn’t ever going to talk about those because the massacres happened under the type of government — that would be “Marxist” — that they themselves support and wish were in power.
“While shooting homicides fell last year, on average they killed 40 people each day.” Sounds horrible, dunnit? Except that in 2024, the total number of deaths was 3,072,666, or 8,418 per day. Ummmm carry the three… so gunshot deaths (assuming that 40/day is accurate hem hem) accounted for 0.48% of the total. Let’s do a little comparison, shall we?
Gunshot deaths per day: 40. Now the U.S. daily death rate (according to these guys) breaks down by category as follows:
- Heart disease: 1,873 (22%)
- Cancer: 1,698 (20%)
- Accidents (all causes): 541 (6.4%)
- Stroke: 457 (5.4%)
- Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 399 (4.7%)
- Alzheimer’s: 317 (3.8%)
- Diabetes: 258 (3.1%)
- Liver disease/cirrhosis: 143 (1.7%)
Oh, and I’m willing to bet that the Guardian‘s 40 gunshot deaths per day includes suicides, which each year account for about half of all gun deaths.
Okay, one last thing: “…many recent firearms purchasers were open to political violence.” Yeah, and considering the recent spate of would-be assassins, almost all those thus predisposed were lefties or nutcases. In this country, they are akin to Guardian readers.
Fucking prats, the lot of them.
Yeah, We’ll Never Know
…what the WHPC shooter’s motives were, according to that lying sack of shit Obama:
“Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night’s shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, it’s incumbent upon us all to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy.”
Yeah, apart from the scrote’s actual published words, that is. The guy could have been carrying a handwritten, signed note in his pocket saying “I want to kill Trump!” and I bet Obama would still have said the same thing, the mealymouthed little motherfucker.
It’s always about “plausible deniability” with these socialist scumbags, isn’t it?
Here’s how I see it. There are two sets of “motives” with all these so-called “random shooters”. The first set of motives is the obvious ones, e.g. what he himself said his motives were.
The second set of motives is what I referred to in last week’s post about the Anarchists’ Playbook:
All these “Ego” Anarchists had responded to the principle of Anarchy — “The Idea”, as Barbara Tuchman described it in the Proud Tower — and its primary focus was on destruction of a state or institution, perpetrated by a lone individual guided by near-insanity or else a mind infused with hatred for “the System” and its leaders.
We’re seeing it now, all over again: Charlie Kirk of Turning Point, assassinated by Tyler Robinson; Brian Thompson of United Healthcare, assassinated by Luigi Mangione, and various other such attempted assassinations.
…and now we can add this latest little turd to the file of “attempted assassinations”.
Barack Obama and his merry little band of Commies can bleat all they want about unknown motives, but they are flat-out lying. They know all too well what these motives are because they’re encouraging them, they and their little lickspittles in the media and academia.
I need to quit now before I’m accused of suggesting that Obama et al. should be dragged up the gallows stairs for being guilty of fomenting insurrection and assassinations.
Followup Rant
Kruiser went a little nuts yesterday, talking about evil Democrats:
The most prominent people in the Democratic Party in 2026 are filth. They are all mentally unstable pathological liars who don’t deserve things like the benefit of the doubt in any situation, bipartisan overtures, or the presumption that they’re not inherently evil.
Now when I say “nuts”, I mean nuts — for him. (For me, that’s just a mild-mannered dissertation.)
He then backs off a little by saying NADALT:
I would like to make it clear that I don’t believe that all Democrats are this way. The party has unfortunately been hijacked by a bunch of loudmouth coastal lunatics who, in my less-than-humble opinion, have irreparably damaged the brand and political relations in this country. That’s right, I don’t think that there is an antidote to the poison that they’ve injected into the American political conversation and I think that anyone who does is hopelessly naive.
The relatively normal Democrats who live in flyover country need to find a way to assert themselves — ballot box, anyone? — and make it clear that paste-eating morons like Hakeem Jefferies and Chuck Schumer are not at all representative of them. They are running out of time to make this case. It won’t cure the aforementioned poison if they do, but it might mitigate its effects. That really is the best that I can hope for, anyway.
I’m heartily sick of hearing that there are “moderate” Democrats. There aren’t. “Moderate Democrats” (in historical terms) are now moderate Republicans, which is why Flyover Country is massively Republican. Those moderate Democrats looked at what their party had become and said, “Uh…no.” Now they either vote Republican or sit out the elections.
If they don’t, and pull the straight-D lever on Election Day, then they’re no better than the loony Lefties, because by pulling that lever, they’re enabling the actual filth to continue being filthy.
My suggestion for the filthy:
Yeah, it’s a euphemism. After all, that’s what they’d do to us, given the opportunity.
Remember Cambodia?
Those weren’t conservative Cambodians pulling the triggers.
Amateurs Vs. Professionals
In which some smart guy compares the hard-headed and realistic professionalism of Trump’s foreign policy towards Iran vs. that of the feckless Obama administration.
While then-Secretary of State John Kerry famously treated Iranian negotiators like esteemed colleagues, Vice President JD Vance just treated them like a landlord dealing with a delinquent tenant who thinks he owns the building.
I’d like to think that was Kerry’s underpinning philosophy — simple foolishness and a massive misread of the room — but then I’d have to think that Fuckface’s dealings with Iran didn’t involve in-depth discussions with Barack Traitor Obama, who always had another, more malevolent attitude towards his adopted country.
The fact of the matter is that the Obama administration sold the United States out to Iran — with cash as well as white-glove treatment — and it’s taken us this long to reverse that ghastly policy.