I would urge you all to read this Twatter post. It’s a tad long, but what I say below the fold will make a great deal more sense if you do.
Category: Anarchist thugs
Yeah, Whatever
Anytime a couple of anarchists blow themselves up, it’s a good day for the world:
The bodies of an anarchist couple were found beneath the rubble of a cottage on the outskirts of Rome after they blew themselves up while making a bomb.
Police believed Alessandro Mercogliano, 53, and 36-year-old Sara Ardizzone were plotting an attack against a police station and Leonardo, a defense contractor, which made parts for F-35 jets.
Traces of ammonium nitrate, a chemical used to make explosives, were found in the debris of the abandoned building beside an ancient Roman aqueduct on Friday.
Police said the pair were supporters of Alfredo Cospito, the jailed figurehead of a loosely-organized anarchist network called the Informal Anarchist Federation.
I must admit, though, I like the name: “Informal Anarchist”. I’m something of an “Informal Commie Killer”, myself — except I’m not going to actually do something like shoot a few Commies, oh no not me, no sirree.
Anyway, to return to the main point:
Disappeared Without A Trace
Why have I not seen much about this story?
A man is dead following an overnight break-in attempt at President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.
Authorities say Austin Tucker Martin, 21, breached the perimeter at Mar-a-Lago on Feb. 22 carrying what appeared to be a shotgun and a fuel can. Two U.S. Secret Service agents and a Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy spotted him near the property’s north gate and ordered him to drop his weapons.
Martin lowered the gas can but, according to Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, raised the shotgun “into a shooting position.” The agents and deputy began to shoot, killing him.
Have we become so inured to random acts of assassination directed at Trump that we just lose interest quickly?
Oh wait:
Authorities have not said how many shots were fired, who fired the fatal round, or what — if any — connection Martin had to extremist groups or ideologies. His motive for approaching the estate armed with a shotgun and a fuel can remains unknown.
Never mind, I’m sure that all will be explained in due course. (See Page T17, right underneath the tide tables and crossword puzzle.)
Ambulances?
Probably coincidence, but….
Naked man steals ambulance in Wisconsin, leading police on wild chase
…and:
Suspect’s Plan to Torch ICE Facility with Gasoline-Soaked Ambulance Fails to Ignite
WTF?
Anyway, in the first case, the punishment should be a simple one: whack his (exposed) pee-pee.
In the second case, the punishment should be equally simple: whack his pee-pee with a machete.
Some may think this is too Krool & Hartless, no doubt. I disagree. Dousing the asshole with gasoline and setting him on fire — now that may be a little K&H, although it does agree with the “make the punishment fit the crime” dictum.
Escalation
One of the very first things my father taught me was an important one: Never point your toy gun at a policeman. As he explained further, you may know it’s a toy gun, but he doesn’t: so there’s a good chance he might shoot you. And it would be your fault.
Continuing the chronicles of the Left playing out its little Insurrection Fantasy, we see this latest example:
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) riots by Antifa and other activists since June 2025 may have now claimed what could have been the first killing tied to this anti-ICE operation in Portland, following a Friday-night drive-by shooting.
Here’s the relevant bit:
Instead of using an actual gun, however, the angry shooter, a woman, used a reported non-lethal BB-type gun and shot at least one right-wing livestreamer in the face and arm multiple times. Others may have been hit as well.
As someone pointed out:
Had it been real, they’d be dead or wounded.
And had someone returned fire and killed this drunken bitch, no doubt the wails would have been deafening: “It was just a little toyyyyyy!“
Yup, and she would have been killed by just a little bullet.
Keep sowing the wind, Leftie scum. The Revolution wants and needs martyrs, and it won’t take long before that wish is granted. Just remember: you started it.
What he said.
Incitement
Well now, isn’t that special?
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) went on a tirade, during which he appeared to say that citizens would be justified in shooting ICE agents.
“But what is really the major problem in this country today is the fascism in our streets, the attacks on American citizens by masked hoodlums,” Nadler began. “If you were attacked by a masked person, you might think you were being kidnapped. You’d be justified in shooting the person to protect yourself.”
It has long been established that ICE agents wear masks because they are under threat of the radical left identifying and doxxing them. On top of that, even masked ICE agents are clearly identifiable as federal agents every single time. There is no need to suggest that it would be justified to shoot ICE agents.
“But we see people being shot, for what? For driving a car?” Nadler added.
Here we go. Throw in a few blatant untruths or careful elisions — that would be “attacked by a masked person [wearing a clearly-identifiable law enforcement uniform]” and “being shot for driving a car [at people wearing clearly-identifiable law enforcement uniforms]” — and guess what? According to this Nadler asshole, “You’d be justified at shooting the person to protect yourself.”
Yes. Let’s see how that plays out in a courtroom, shall we?
But what the hell, if that fat fuck Nadler can say what he said, then I’ll say this:
I hope that in these specious cases of self-defense, the perpetrators never make it as far as the courtroom, but end up lying in a pool of their own blood right there in the streets, shot dead by law enforcement.
Enough, as they say, is enough. The Left seems eager for a crowd of martyrs to further their little anti-ICE / anti-Trump PR campaign; maybe it’s time we gave them what they want, in spades.