
OR this:

Remington R10 7.62 NATO AR-308 Semi Auto Rifle 16″ Barrel
Not just the guns, but all the stuff that goes with them
As Longtime Readers know full well, I have fairly set opinions when it comes to firearms: .45 ACP good, 9mmP bad; Browning High Power good, Glock Mod [anything] bad; mil-surp bolt-action rifles good, poodleshooter rifles bad; and so on. Sometimes an exception to all this may come up, to be sure, but not that often that I have to change my opinions.
One of my prejudices is in the area of shotguns — and it’s purely a personal one — where I firmly believe that shotgun barrels should be side by side (like a man and his dog), and not over and under (like a man and his mistress). It’s a very old-fashioned viewpoint — like so many of my others — but I have to tell you that in this case, I may be steering newcomers to the field in a direction that may not be the better.
However, this is based on my own preference and shooting habits. Truth is that unless I’m Over There, blazing away at clays with Mr. Free Market, I hardly if ever shoot shotguns. Once again, this is just a preference, or even a habit. Not having grown up with shotguns (as many have), shotgunning is more of an occasional indulgence than a regular outing. This is not true of any other firearm type, where I can be found at DFW Gun Range most weeks, burning out the barrels of my Springfield 1911, AK-47 and any number of .22 rifles or pistols.
And this is where I may have led some astray, because pithy throwaway comments like the shotgun barrel-orientation one above are fine as far as they go — but they’re not appropriate. How so?
The plain fact of the matter is that if you shoot shotguns a lot — never mind people like Kim Rhode, I’m talking people like Mr. Free Market, who orders shotgun ammo by the pallet every year for his birdshooting escapades — that amount of shooting is going to destroy your side-by-side shotgun’s action, as any competent gunsmith will tell you. The firing of an off-center barrel puts a great deal of torque onto the action, and even guns made with the most modern steels and alloys are going to deteriorate more quickly than their over-and-under cousins.
The proof of the above statement can be seen, quite simply, in Olympic- and championship skeet and clay competitions, where everybody uses an over-and-under gun for the simple reason that they expend tens of thousands of rounds in practice; and that amount of shooting would reduce any side-by-side shotgun to tangled metal in short order.
So if you’re a keen nay even rabid shotgunner, I’m saying, you may be better off with an O/U gun than the old SxS bangstick. Even more telling, if you’re going to shoot off that many rounds each year, you need to spend maybe a bit more than you expect on your shotgun — right now, that might be $1,500 and preferably more for a second-hand model, and a great deal more to be on the safe side. Rule of thumb: shoot more rounds, spend more on the gun.
All that, so I can show you pics of beautiful O/U shotguns.
Now when it comes to brands, you pays yer money and you takes yer choice. As the title of this post suggests, I’m way out of my comfort zone talking about this part of The Gun Thing, so let me just post a couple of unsolicited testimonials.
The aforementioned Mr. Free Market shoots the Beretta 686 Silver Pigeon exclusively. He wore out one pair of 686s after a few years. After his second set, he had to quit shooting 12ga because he was sick of having shoulder repair surgery every three or four years, and simply replaced his guns with the same model in 20ga. Here’s what we’re talking about:
Right now, you can get this gun at Collectors for just under $2,500. If your preference is for Moar Beretta, there’s the 695, at $4,250:

Another guy who shoots the hell out of his shotguns is former POTUS George W. Bush, who publicly announced his preference for the Weatherby Athena:
Collectors price: just under $2,000 (although this particular piece is an older one — the more recent vintages can be quite a lot more expensive).
Noted Brit shotgunner Dave Carrie refers Browning O/Us (I think Miroku, or else the Citori models). Here’s one of the latter:

And speaking of Dave Carrie, here’s a side-by-side shoot. (Good luck with the accents… and I should point out that shoots like those of the Dave Carrie type are as yet unchecked on Ye Olde Bucquette Lyst. That’s just in case Mr. FM happens by this part of the front porch…)
As with all things pertaining to shotgunnery, you can get guns priced out to the stratosphere, e.g. the usual suspects such as this mob, these guys and of course the Germans. Here’s a Perazzi SCO Galeazzi:

How much? Well, as they say, “If you have to ask…”
All comments on this topic gratefully received.
From CW comes this take:

To my mind, it looks like a prop from a Ron Jeremy porno flick. And as Ron’s costars might all tell you, there’s nothing like wood.


These are the guns which sold as a lot for a total of $1,100 at a recent auction.
Now granted, they all look rather well-used (rode hard and put away wet, as the saying goes), and I suspect most will require some serious gunsmithing to get up to snuff. Nevertheless, I for one would welcome any one of them into Ye Olde Gunne Sayffe (especially the 1897 pump at the top), let alone all six.
Yummy.
Advance notice: tomorrow’s GGP post will contain MOAR shotguns. You have been warmed.

At least 100 rounds of your favorite centerfire ammo; at least 500 rounds of rimfire.
…and forget not that it’s my birthday too; so if any Kynde Soulle wants to send a token gesture of appreciation out to the sooper-seekrit mailing address, it would be much appreciated.
Not long ago, I happened to see SOTI (Somewhere On The Internet) a link to one of my earlier Other Side Of Kim posts, and when I followed the link out of idle curiosity, of course I hit the “Site No Longer Around” page.
But as I recall, it had quite a few comments attached, so in the interests of causing mayhem, I’ve decided to republish the thing, more or less unchanged except that I’ve added pics. (Newcomers are in red, deletions/substitutions at the bottom of this post.) What amazes me is — surprise, surprise — how little I’ve changed my mind over the dozen-odd years that have passed.

Okay, I’ve just about had it with those crappy articles which ask stupid questions like: “If you could own only one gun, which would it be?” or “Name the gun you’d like to shoot exclusively for the rest of your life?” and so on. (And yes, I’ve probably written more of this type of nonsense than any two gun writers combined.)
All the above involve choices which require painful reflection and soul-searching.
But what about if you had no restrictions on quantity (speaking reasonably, that is—some guy might want thirty AK-47s, but that’s just silly, unless he’s the Commandant of his local Red Dawn unit [eyecross]).
So, if we can agree that “one hundred” is a nice round number, herewith are my choices for Kim’s Top 100 Gun Choices (and if you think that a hundred is “too constricting”, you may need help). For ease of reference, I’ve broken them down into sub-groups—BUT: if you think that shotguns are woefully under-represented when you draw up your own list, that’s fine. As to the composition of the list, I am of course hopelessly and unrepentantly old-fashioned, so if you are mortally offended that I didn’t put your favorite H&K Model Whatever on the list, that’s just too damn bad.
The guns are listed alphabetically, not in order of preference.



















Rimfire Handguns (all .22 LR unless otherwise)















































































You might think that it took me a long time to compile this list of favorites, but you’d be wrong. It took me less than a couple of hours.
Most of the guns will be familiar to everyone (with the possible exception of the AyA shotguns), and if not, they’re in the GGP section. There are a couple of notable omissions, which probably need a little explanation.
So there you have it: Kim’s favorite 100 guns. Something to please, and to offend, everyone. Kinda like all my posts.
Deleted (and substitutions):
Any questions about the above selections / deletions / substitutions will be answered in Comments.