The .32 ACP / 7.65mm Browning Cartridge

…is probably the answer to the question: “What non-.22 cartridge is the most fun to shoot?”, and it’s most certainly true in my case.

The problem with the .32 ACP is that it’s an old cartridge:  it was very popular during the early 20th century (and is still among the most popular handgun cartridges ever), but was soon superseded by more powerful cartridges such as the 9mm Parabellum, .380 ACP (9mm Kurz) and of course the .45 ACP.

And justifiably so, because it’s really not a stopper, by any measure.  Of course, with proper bullet placement, your target is not going to feel well at all, but that’s pretty much true of the .22 LR as well.  (I’ll come back to the ammo later in this post.)

Still, of all the semi-automatic pistols I’ve ever fired (which is quite a few), those chambered for the .32 ACP were the most pleasant.  And the .32 ACP is also part of the question:  can any invention by John Moses Browning be that bad?  (Answer:  no.)  For that reason alone, the cartridge should not be easily tossed aside.

In the early 1900s, a whole bunch of gun companies offered a pistol thus chambered.  Here’s the doyen of them all, the FN / Colt / Browning 1903 (also commonly referred to as the “Pocket” model):

I’ve shot several of these, and all were exquisite guns to shoot.  One in particular, which had been expertly re-blued in Colt’s Royal Blue (non-original) finish, made me drool bigly, and offer the owner lots of money on the spot, but the bastard declined all offers with a supercilious sneer.  And I can’t say I blame him, either.  Collectors has a few in stock (such as the above example), and all go for about $1,500 to $2,000 depending on quality.

The next is probably the most popular of all, the Walther PPK:

I’ll come right out and say it:  the 7.65mm Browning (Euro nomenclature of the .32 ACP) version of this pistol is the best of them all to shoot, with gentle recoil and astounding accuracy.  I’ve actually done a side-by-side comparison of the PPK versions at the range, and while the .380 ACP/9mm Kurz version is okay, the 9mm Para too much — the .32 is the Goldilocks.  From a price perspective, I should say that the PPK carries the Walther Premium;  in decent condition, they can fetch anywhere from $1,200 to Stupid.

One pistol that needs mentioning is the Savage 1907:

Several things need to be said about the 1907.  The action is wonderfully reliable — the .45 ACP version performed well and was actually preferred by several of the testers against the Colt 1911 in the original U.S. Army tests — but the problem with the 1907 today is that most of them have been carried often, fired lots and not really looked after.  Consequently, they look like hell and need to be approached with caution.  The one I shot belonged to a good friend, and was in near-mint condition.  (Yes, he also told me to take a hike when I offered to buy it from him after a single mag’s worth of shooting.)

Another worthy of mention is “Eva Braun’s” pistol, the Ortgies:

Made after WWI, the Ortgies was very popular among serious target shooters in Germany, and won several national competitions.  (Hitler gave one to his squeeze, hence the nickname.  It’s still around.)  John Dillinger also carried one in his pocket, so you know it works.  When you can find one, a good shooter will run around $700 or so.

Finally, there are the modern .32 ACP pistols — i.e. ones still in current (or at least recent) production.  I’m going to come right out and say that I don’t care for most of them, for the simple reason that as a rule (Beretta 2032 Tomcat, Seecamp LWS, NAA, Kel-Tec P32 etc.) their barrels are too short (usually around 2″-2.5″), and to be honest, the .32 ACP needs a 3.75″ or longer barrel to get the most out of it, both in terms of accuracy and stopping power (such as it is).

The only modern .32 ACP pistol I’d consider is the SIG P230 (itself a near-clone of the PPK):

Confusingly, SIG uses the P230 nomenclature for its .380 ACP chambering as well, so if you’re shopping for one, check accordingly.  Of course, SIG doesn’t make the P230 .32 anymore because idiots, but expect to pay around $650 for one in decent shape.  Here’s one I’d get in a heartbeat, if I could find one in .32 ACP because it’s gorgeous:


(this one is in .380 ACP, judging by the ammo pictured)

Okay, and now we come to the really, really Bad Thing about the older .32 ACP pistols:  replacement / additional magazines.

Cliff Notes:  they don’t exist.
Corollary:  if they do exist, they go for Stupid Money.

The Walther PPK-original mags with the finger extensions are a classic example ($60+ coff coff), but at least Mec-Gar makes a decent substitute, for half that.  (The finger extensions are necessary, because unlike the Colt 1903, most .32 ACP automatics have short grips.)

And speaking of the 1903, replica magazines can set you back around $60.  (I don’t have the stomach to research what COLT OEM mags might cost.)

Finally, we come to the ammo.

Unsurprisingly (given the total number of guns made in this chambering), the .32 ACP is still popular, and just about everybody makes it, for a per-round cost of anywhere between 32 cents to 45 cents.  That’s quite spendy compared to its plinking competition (e.g. .22 LR at 7 cents), but I have to tell you that the fun factor more than makes up for it.  Mostly, the cheapest type is full metal jacket (FMJ), but I see that my Balkan buddies also make an affordable 71-grain hollowpoint (JHP) (~40 cents per pull vs. Winchester White Box at 66 cents, ugh).  If I were to consider carrying such a pistol (as a backup only), I’d load it with Hornady Critical Defense rounds.  Caveat:  I’ve only ever fired FMJ ammo through these pistols, and I don’t know if the JHP would have feeding problems;  but I doubt it.

Okay, here’s my final take on this topic.

With sufficient funds, I’d get the Colt 1903 in a heartbeat.  No question, no hesitation.

For about half the money, I’d get the SIG P230.  Also, without hesitation.

As for the cheaper or smaller guns:  I wouldn’t bother.

Your opinions may vary.

18 comments

  1. I have the Beretta (what a POS) and an FN 1022 in .32ACP. The 1022 was prior-military(has stamps from those eevil Germans) and shoots like a dream.

  2. I have a CZ27 that was my grandma’s carry gun. It, too, has the evil stamps. It’s fun to shoot.
    Two of my daughters are ready to fight for it when I’m ready to pass it on.

  3. The interesting thing to me about .32 hand guns is that they were all banned in Canada, about 40 years ago I think, and any legally in circulation and registered were seized. .32 ammunition as well.

    Politicians think they are small enough that they might get assassinated more easily.

    That seizure, and others later, is why there are millions of unlicensed fire-arms in Canada.

    1. .32 causes more assassinations?

      Pffft.

      As any fule kno, it takes .380 ACP to start a world war.

  4. I always had a particular love for the Art Deco lines of the Savage. Bid on a couple at the Rock Island auction, but alas it got too far north for me to pursue it.

    Found one about 2 years ago as a consignment sale at one of my Hidey Holes. But $600 was just too much for what would be a toy. Hell, its hard right now to find time/place to shoot my collectables that I DO have ammo for, because every place we used to go shoot is overrun.

  5. I had a chance to shoot both the Sig and Walther, both are beautiful looking pistols.
    Both gave me a nice case of slide bite.

    Oh well saved me some money .

  6. Concur, the 1903 is a classy classic gentleman’s pistol, and a delight to shoot.

    About those pistols for folks on a budget. Back in another life as an FFL, my dealer cost on surplus PA-63’s In 9mm Makarov was $99.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEG_PA-63

    In stock trim, they have two annoyances: 1) The double action trigger pull is horrendous, like 22 pounds. Fortunately easily correctable by replacing the hammer and recoil springs. 2) The mags do not drop from the mag well because the tab on the follower that engages the slide stop drags in the mag well. This requires a bit more finesse to correct.

    Comfortable to shoot? Not really. With the aluminum frame, they are snappy. The first mag is okay. By the end of the second, the web between my thumb and fore finger is tired and needs a break. That said, like most fixed barrel pistols, they are superbly accurate, shooting tight groups right at point of aim. I kept two for myself and carry on daily.

    Hornady makes an FTX round in 9mm Makarov.

    1. I have a PA63 makarov. It’s the only one of my pistols I really don’t enjoy shooting. My CZ 82 in Makarov however is an absolute pleasure.

  7. “Of course, with proper bullet placement, your target is not going to feel well at all, but that’s pretty much true of the .22 LR as well. ”

    I think the ultimate example of that is here. (In 1953, a 63-year-old Cree Indian woman killed a world-record grizzly bear with a single-shot .22LR rifle.)

  8. My WWII veteran uncle came back with a 9mm Luger, 9mm Mauser C96, and a 7.65 Walther PPK. When he turned 65 he offered them to his nephews. The oldest chose the Luger, my other cousin selected the Broomhandle, and since I was the youngest ended up the the Walther PPK. It has the Luftwaffe cartouche and I have shot it a few times but it is too small for my hands. It has some holster wear but the bore is clean and the internals show almost no wear. It has been a safe queen for the past 30 years.

  9. Couldn’t let this go by without mentioning the ultimate .32, the Chez VZ-61. Recoil is so low and rpm so high that if you’re good you can empty the 20rd mag into a little over a quarter-size hole at 15 yards or so. Lots of fun.

  10. we had a couple cartons of that come in a few weeks ago. Customer asked if that was all we had. Upon my reply of “yes,” he pushed all of it into his shopping basket.

    JQ

  11. The .32 PPK is the only one of these pistols I’ve shot, and I can’t argue with your assessment. I’d suggest the 9×18 Makarov as a plausible runner-up; maybe even equivalent in terms of its fun-to-shoot quotient. I still shoot mine regularly.

  12. One unfortunate attribute of the .32ACP is the possibility of “rim-lock,” in which the rim of one cartridge in a magazine edges over the one beneath it, tying up the gun and preventing it from firing. This is because the .32ACP is “semi-rimmed” as designed by Browning. The .380ACP, on the other hand, is rimless and cannot cause a “rim-lock” situation.

    For my own favorite .32ACP handguns, I like the Beretta 81 and the Mauser HSc.

Comments are closed.