Gratuitous Gun Pic — S&W Victory (.22 LR)

Reader Chris S., who is a Very Bad Man, sends me a pic of his S&W Victory pistol:

Now I have to say that this absolutely did not leave the factory looking like that (nothing wrong there, of course).  Chris adds the following:

The trigger is excellent, about a 3.5 lb pull. The flat trigger has adjustments for pre and post travel, but I think that all models have the same great trigger feel. This handgun is a keeper. 
I’ll say it is.  That right there is prettier than the average Alabama cheerleader.

Range Report: .38 Special

As any fule kno, I am not a huge fan of .357 Mag ammo unless fired from a rifle like the Marlin 1894:

…or at least via a revolver with a 6″ barrel, such as the Python or S&W 686:

(Of the now-discontinued Ruger GP100, we will not speak.)

With any of the above, though, the .357 Mag is wonderful and I would certainly trust it with my life.

However, I don’t have a 6″ .357 revolver, only a S&W Model 65 with its 4-incher:


…and the .357 doth beat up my wrists most foully.  (As any woman of experience will tell you, an extra two inches in the tube makes things so much better.)

Anyway, this is a long and roundabout way of telling you that all my .357 ammo lies inside Ye Olde Ammoe Locquere, to be unpacked when or if I ever get a suitable means of less-painful delivery thereof.

So today we’re talking about the .357 Mag’s smaller sibling, the .38 Special which, as any fule kno, can be chambered with confidence in any .357 Mag revolver (but not, of course, vice versa)

Now I’ve always regarded the venerable .38 Spec as a decent, perhaps even marginal self-defense load;  but with the advent of proper self-defense cartridges such as Hornady’s Critical Defense, these reservations have mostly disappeared.  Indeed, all my .38 revolvers are loaded with said ammo, and I don’t feel at all undergunned on the few occasions I take them out for some fresh air, in place of the 1911.  I have no actual reason for doing this, unless it’s because the “1911 pants” (i.e. those with 1911 holsters strapped to them) are in the laundry basket and I’m left with the “revolver pants”.

Okay, so if I’m “stuck” with .38 Specials, then which ones should I keep in stock?  On the basis of “more is better”, would the .38 Spec +P be even better than “ordinary” .38 Spec?  And is there any serious difference in recoil between the .38 Spec and the +P anyway, given that I’ve become a total recoil wussy in my old age?

This, of course, calls nay shouts out for a range trip, so off I went to Texas Legends, using my S&W Model 65 (“bedside”) as the delivery device.  The ammo I took was this selection:


Hornady Critical Defense .38 Special 110gr Flex Tip, which lives in all my revolvers, whether .357 Mag or .38 Spec, bedside, carry or fun guns.

Then some +P:

…and lastly, some budget FMJ, just for kicks (so to speak):

And for those who weren’t paying attention, the specs for each:

110gr Flex-Tip (i.e. hollowpoints)
125gr JHP
130gr FMJ

Now one would think that the difference in bullet weights as well as the added +P charge would make a difference in felt recoil between the different cartridges, but let me tell you:  it didn’t.  All the ammo felt exactly the same, as I discovered when I loaded two of each into the cylinder.

So all that taken care of, I settled down for a little practice with each, doing single-action “aimed rapid” (one or two seconds between trigger pulls, each shot under a cocked hammer).  Then for the hell of it, I loaded up two cylinders each of the Win +P and Herter FMJ, and went for “double-action rapid”, as fast as I could reacquire the target and squeeze the trigger. Here are the results, all at 20 feet (7 yards).

Next time, I’ll do the same test with the old 6″-barreled S&W, just for the hell of it.

Let’s see if I can’t tighten up the groups a little…

Range Report: T/C Compass (6.5mm Creedmoor)

I was having a transatlantic chat with Mr. Free Market the other day, and he was telling me about his latest deer cull on Lord Someone’s estate up in Scotland — an annual event, you may recall, which includes the company of Doc Russia and Combat Controller in the slaughter.  Here are two of their implements of Mass Deer Destruction:


(L-R:  Blaser, Remington 700 in .300 Win Mag)

Here’s Mr. FM, with his Tikka in .70 Win):

I’m now too old to participate in such merriment — the cost, weather and terrain pretty much rule it out for me —  but that doesn’t mean I don’t feel a little tug when I see pics like the above.

However — and this will come as a huge shock to Longtime Readers — even had I been up to a visit Over There… I wouldn’t have had a proper “reach out and touch” rifle.  I know, I know;  Kim The Ultimate Mauser Guy without a decent hunting (or sniper-, take your pic) rifle?  Say it ain’t so!

Actually, I do have a rifle capable of such an activity:  it’s the last of The Late Lamented Layabout Sailor’s guns, which I have absolutely been unable to sell, a T/C Compass in 6.5mm Creedmoor (which the Widow Irish said I should hold onto until such time as, because she doesn’t want it around in her house).  Here it is:


…and, in the lovely words of the same Mr. FM, it’s uglier than a bucketful of burst arseholes.

Nevertheless, beggars can’t be choosers, and all it needed was a halfway-decent scope, and I happened to have a spare Burris Fullfield 2-8x35mm lying around, so…

…I mounted it on the Compass on Monday evening, and took it off to Texas Legends yesterday.


(That’s a Noveski KX3 flash hider / noisemaker, not a suppressor… but soon, baby.)

I didn’t bother to boresight the thing, just screwed it in place and trusted to luck or whatever that I’d actually hit the target.  En route, I remembered just in time that I didn’t have any 6.5 Creed ammo, so I swung by Cabela’s and grabbed a box of Remington Green Box 140gr because it was the cheapest.

“So, Kim… how did it shoot?”

Cold barrel, no sight adjustment, first time ever on the trigger, 5-round string at 50 yards:


…the orange dot being the point of aim.

Wow.

Okay, here’s what I didn’t like about the Compass (other than its looks, i.e. that ‘orrible plastic stock):  the magazine.  It’s a rotary thing which holds five rounds (5+1 in common parlance), and it’s a cast-iron bitch to load (certainly at first try, anyway).  T/C no longer make the thing, which doesn’t surprise me, but there are aftermarket options available.  My major gripe is that it’s impossible to reload the magazine through the mag well (and I tried, trust me on this).  You have to take the thing out of the rifle to reload it.  On balance, though, it’s not a big deal.

What did I love about the Compass?  The trigger, which has been pulled maybe a dozen or so times, was excellent — as good as any Mauser trigger under the same circumstances.  Takeup is smooth and regular, no grittiness, and the sear release is consistent and smooth as silk.  The action is likewise lovely, the bolt works smoothly and without issue.  And everything else about the rifle is excellent.

So… am I going to keep it?

Yes.  As soon as the funds are available, I’ll be paying the Widow Irish for the rifle.  And I’ll be tossing the box away this afternoon.

Here’s the thing:  given how many times I’m likely to use it — it’s a backup rifle at best —  the T/C Compass is a good, serviceable rifle, every bit as good as the budget-line Mossberg Patriot and far better than the Savage Axis.  The chambering is okay — I know, I’d probably prefer it in .243 Win, .270 Win or even 6.5x55mm Swede — but as the 6.5 Creed is the latest thing for all the cool kids to shoot, it’s available pretty much everywhere.

As for the ammo:  were I at all interested in tightening up the group, there are any number of the Usual Suspects to call on:  Remington Premier Match, Fiocchi Hyperformance, Federal Gold Match, whatever.  As it is, however, I’ll probably just stick with the Green Box;  I’ve dropped many a game animal with this brand, and I’m confident that their Core-Lokt 140gr pointed soft point (PSP) bullets will take care of pretty much anything I need them to.  And at about $1.20 per pull, it’s about the same as even the budget Prvi Partizan offerings.

At a later stage, I’ll bring the group down to land about an inch over the 50-yard aim point, but sufficient unto the day etc. etc.  In the meantime, National Ammo Day is approaching, which is when I’ll likely get the half-dozen or so boxes that will keep me going pretty much for the rest of my life.

Good times, good times.

Tomorrow I’ll talk about the second part of the range session.

Our Little Gun-Controller

And this is the shitbag the local Socialists in the Raving Loony Party want to send to the U.S. Senate to represent Texas:

Asked in September whether a federal ban on semi-automatic rifles was still on the table, U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico didn’t hedge.

“Absolutely,” he told NewsNation’s Leland Vittert.

That wasn’t a slip. As a state representative, Talarico co-authored a bill to report Texans to the sheriff for buying two guns in five days, co-authored a felony for transferring America’s most popular rifle to adults under 21, voted three times against Constitutional Carry, wrote a bill to let the state deny carry licenses at its discretion, and tried to criminalize open carry in public libraries.

His record isn’t a mystery. It’s written into the bills.

There are apparently forecasts for today’s weather that warn of severe thunderstorms and heavy rain, and the Texas Republicans are urging us to brave the weather to go and vote.

Me, I don’t need any urging.  I wouldn’t care if it was raining broken glass and I was barefoot, I’d still be going out to vote against this effete little cocksucker.

Consolidation Pt 2

Hmmmm…

Smith & Wesson announced today that it has acquired Savage Arms from JDH Holdings in a $160 million stock-and-cash transaction. 

The move brings the 132-year-old Massachusetts-based Savage Arms, known best for its accurate and innovative rifles and shotguns, squarely under the umbrella of the even more senior 174-year-old S&W. For its part, Smith & Wesson already has a healthy catalog of modern pistols, revolvers, lever guns, suppressors, and modern sporting rifles.

Smith & Wesson stated the acquisition “creates a compelling platform to generate sustainable, long-term growth” in its press release announcing the move.

“The acquisition of Savage is transformative for Smith & Wesson and contributes to our objective of becoming the undisputed market leader in the firearm industry,” said Mark Smith, president and CEO of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. “With this transaction, we have significantly expanded our presence in the hunting category, particularly in bolt-action rifles, which will enable us to better serve our customers.”

Okay, I guess.  I like the idea of S&W and Savage under the same roof, so to speak, because by and large they don’t have much overlap in general terms.  To simplify the thing:  Smith doesn’t make precision rifles, and Savage doesn’t make revolvers, so that should work out okay.

The problem I have with this (and the Beretta/Ruger merger) is that it simplifies the market, and not necessarily for the better.  Now, instead of four large gun companies, we have two giant ones — and in principle, I don’t like oligarchies;  I like competition to come from all over the place.

I’m reserving judgment on this merger — and feel free to tell me if I’ve completely missed the point — but I have to say, I have a bad feeling in my gut about it.

Product Consolidation

…as Ruger might call it, or as others (like myself) might call it: “heritage destruction”.

Ruger officials confirmed industry chatter this week that it would immediately stop producing four models, while it will halt production of several others at the end of the year. 

Production of four revolver lines – some going back to 1958 – would be suspended, effective immediately: 

    • LCR
    • SP101
    • GP100
    • Bearcat

On Tuesday, the company announced changes to several current-generation product families as part of its ongoing Ruger 2030 strategy.

“These decisions reflect our review of consumer demand, evolving market preferences, manufacturing complexity and the long-term profitability of each product family,” Abbey Clary, Ruger’s director of media, advertising and public relations, told Guns.com in an email. “The goal is to focus our resources on the products consumers want most today while creating capacity for future product development and manufacturing modernization.”

I leave it to y’all to decide what Clary really means with the above corporate wafflespeak, but a decent summary might be:  “If you ain’t gonna buy ’em, we ain’t gonna make ’em”.

Fair enough.  Revolvers, and the people who love shooting them, are clearly a dying market (literally, in the latter case).

But the good news doesn’t end there, oh no.

A larger group of products are nearing suspension, with their final planned production runs through the remainder of 2026. They include:

    • SR1911
    • LC Carbine
    • PC Charger
    • PC Carbine
    • LC Charger
    • Redhawk
    • Super Redhawk
    • Blackhawk
    • Super Blackhawk
    • Single-Series (Six- and Nine) revolvers
    • Vaquero
    • Ruger No. 1
    • 77-Series rifles
    • Hawkeye
    • Ruger Precision Rifle

…leaving one to ask, as the article does, well what the fuck is left?

Rifles:

  • Mini-14 rifle
  • Ruger 10/22
  • Ruger American Rifle
  • Harrier series AR-15s

Pistols:

  • LCP Security 380 and Security 9
  • RXM
  • MAX-9
  • Ruger 57
  • 22 Charger
  • Mark IV

How nice of them to leave us with at least the 10/22 and Mark IV.

Ruger are quitting the 1911 market (probably because their offerings sucked green donkey dicks, so no great loss there), and ditto the “precision” rifle market (because people who do precision rifle shooting generally go for higher-quality platforms like Bergara, Howa and Sako, while for the budget-conscious, there’s always Savage).

Oh, and the relaunch of the excellent Red Label shotguns is irrelevant, because Ruger’s outsourcing the production thereof to Connecticut Shotgun Manufacturing (CSMC) so it’s just a label on someone else’s gun.  I suppose we should be glad that they’re using an American gunmaker instead of some backyard Turkish suppliers.

As a one-time corporate marketing puke myself, I can understand why Ruger is doing this.

As a lifelong gun enthusiast — and a lifelong Ruger buyer — I’m feeling nothing but gloom and despair.

It makes all sorts of sense, financially speaking;  but the joy of shooting Ruger’s incomparable revolvers has just left the building, after kicking people like me in the mouth.

I’m not sure I’ll ever buy a Ruger product again.