When I read this, I couldn’t stop laughing:
That’s not the funny part. This is:
The director bought a home in the iconic San Remo co-op in New York City overlooking Central Park.
Yeah… from Beverly Hills to Manhattan — to escape taxes levied on rich people.
Hey Steve: Say “hi” to Hizzoner Zoran Mamdani for me, willya? You stupid putz.
And some Classical Thought:
So let’s get busy again, with some kiddie jokes:
Time for some medication, methinks:
And more or less in that train of thought:
What… you expected clean & wholesome? Wrong place, and definitely the wrong time.
Back in April last year, I noted that Lee Zeldin was taking aim at this piece of Obama-grade bullshit:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin said that the agency will review the agency’s endangerment finding — the “holy grail of the climate change religion” that has created over a trillion dollars in regulatory impact. The finding stated that greenhouse gas emissions are an alleged threat to public health and welfare.
“Review”, was it? Well now, lookee here:
President Trump is set to repeal an Obama-era climate finding that was the basis for federal greenhouse-gas regulation, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Repealing the finding, which was a scientific determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, would remove the legal basis for greenhouse gas regulation, Reuters reported.
The repeal is expected to be published later this week, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the repeal would be “the largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.”
With the repeal, regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal GHG emission standards for cars would be removed, administration officials told the Journal. However, the repeal would not apply to stationary sources such as power plants.
Time to get one of these precious things, methinks.
And from the Classics:
Let’s get on with it: 
And speaking of that:
Now ride off into the rest of the week.
At least the Japs are being honest about it:
A Tokyo chain pub has set a ban on older customers – in order to try to maintain the raucous, fun atmosphere for which it is known. Tori Yaro Dogenzaka is an izakaya (an affordable Japanese pub) situated in Japan‘s capital city.
This year, the establishment propped up a sign outside the entrance, informing customers of the new rules. The sign said: ‘Entrance limited to customers between the ages of 29 and 39. This is an izakaya for younger generations. Pub for under 40s only.’
I have no idea what constitutes the Japanese drinking demographic, but it must be different from us gaijin because Over Here (and in the rest of the West) we know that Prime Drunk Age is between 16 and 28. So if the Japs are anything like that, a “29-39” pub is not going to be a “raucous and fun” atmosphere; it will be quiet and gloomy, with patrons drinking maybe a couple pints before leaving. (I imagine the soaring price of booze in the Land Of The Rising Sun is if anything higher than it is in Western Civ, which defies comprehension.)
Can’t see a decent profit margin there, but whatever.
What I’d like to see is a bar exclusively for the 65+ age group, selling booze at prices that don’t insult us and are closer to what we used to pay back when we were in our Prime Drunk Age. Make the place’s decor cozy and welcoming, play background music worth listening to (and not played at tinnitus-causing levels so we could, you know, converse without shouting), set up some chess- and backgammon boards, offer darts and dominoes, and provide affordable Uber rides home so the fuzz don’t get all excited when the elderly patrons come staggering out into the street.
At closing time, you’d have to drive me out at gunpoint.
I know, the accountants are going to tell me that such an establishment would be completely “unsustainable” or some such bollocks, but considering how today’s businesses have no problem with wasting jillions of bucks on specious bullshit (e.g. electric fucking cars and Pride Month parade sponsorships), I think that “Ye Olde Pharrttes Arms” concept is worth trying.
Oh, and one absolute and unbreakable stipulation: NO LIVE MUSIC.
A Classical Reminder:
And on we go:
And our usual digression:
Yeah, it’s good to keep healthy, or something.