It’s one thing to have to deal with the Gummint snooping on your every move — literal, and figurative (i.e. your online activities) — but it’s another thing to having GlobalMegaCorp sniffing into your business as well.
Ruter, the [Norwegian] transit authority that runs public buses across Oslo and Akershus, parked two electric buses inside an isolated facility built into a mountain, the kind of shielded space normally used to keep radio signals from leaking in or out, and let its own security engineers take them apart. One bus came from Yutong, the Chinese manufacturer that has quietly become one of Europe’s largest electric bus suppliers. The other was a three-year-old unit from VDL, a Dutch manufacturer. Ruter chose that pairing deliberately: the two buses sit at opposite ends of how connected a modern transit vehicle can be.
And the findings?
Ruter’s own published findings are blunt about the VDL [Dutch] bus: it has no capability for over-the-air software updates at all. Every change to its systems requires a technician to physically connect a cable. That makes it a hassle to service. It also makes it nearly impossible to hijack remotely, which is exactly why Ruter’s engineers moved past it quickly.
The Yutong [Chinese] bus is the opposite. It receives software and diagnostic updates automatically, the same way a phone downloads a firmware patch overnight, except this particular phone weighs roughly 30,000 pounds and carries dozens of passengers through Oslo traffic. That connection routes through a Romanian SIM card, which gives Yutong direct digital access to the bus’s battery and power management systems. Ruter’s engineers concluded that, in theory, this access could be used to stop the bus or render it inoperable, not through some elaborate hack, but simply because the manufacturer already has a standing door into those systems for legitimate diagnostic and update purposes.
Wile all this is alarming, it’s not really surprising. We’ve known for ages that the godless ChiCommies have their dirty little ears glued to just about every damn piece of electronic equipment our friends (!) in Silicon Valley have outsourced to their manufacture.
So now we get to the part that makes me start fixing a lunch bucket, scoping out high buildings and cleaning the Mauser.
None of what Ruter found is exotic. It’s the standard architecture of any modern connected vehicle, and American drivers have been living with a version of it for nearly two decades. General Motors’ OnStar system can, at the company’s discretion, send a cellular command to a stolen vehicle that blocks the ignition from restarting once it’s parked, or gradually slows a moving vehicle so police can recover it safely. That is functionally the same category of access Ruter found in the Yutong bus: a persistent, manufacturer-controlled cellular link with authority over propulsion-adjacent systems, built into the vehicle before it ever reaches a customer’s driveway.
So Big Auto are a bunch of snooping smegma-eaters. We know that, too.
The distinction that actually matters here isn’t whether a manufacturer can reach into a vehicle remotely. Almost every connected car sold today allows that, by design, for updates, diagnostics, and theft recovery. What matters is who holds the authority to use that access, under what legal process, and how many vehicles go dark at once if that access is ever misused, subpoenaed, or compromised.
A single stolen sedan getting slowed to a stop by its own manufacturer is a feature working as intended. An entire transit authority’s bus fleet answering to a remote command from a foreign supplier’s server is a different order of risk entirely, which is exactly why Ruter escalated this to Norway’s national government instead of treating it as an IT ticket.
Now comes the part that has me checking Ye Olde Ammoe Locquer for 8x57mm:
Chinese abuse of this little backdoor activity [sic] is bad, but in the bigger picture, it can be addressed with a carefully-aimed chunk or two of explosive material on the Three Gorges Dam.
What worries me more is that this little pipeline into our cars can also be — and is — at the beck and call of the auto manufacturers, who are only too ready to “share” that data with, say, the insurance industry (hello, fresh revenue stream), and if pressed just a little, with our own Gummint ghouls who infest the alphabet agencies (DHS, NSA, FBI, just to name the three biggest dicks aimed at out collective rectums).
I need to get to the range. So if you’ll excuse me…
The US car makers have already been caught selling individual driving data to insurance companies. F’em.
I don’t understand why Americans have let this shit happen. We’ve gotten way too comfortable with the wrong people Hoovering up our activity, so we can have fucking Bluetooth.
This will be used eventually to keep you in one place, and there’s going to be fuck all you can do about it.
Key word: comfortable. As I’ve said before, convenience is going to kill us all.
That and whatever the drug companies introduce as anti-anxiety drugs (Collectively, Soma). Convenience plus apathetic comfort.
Then there is this —
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3473061589527773
Is that all? Check into what your local constabulary are buying from FLOCK. The mere “traffic cameras” read your license plate, the make/model, your bumper stickers, notable dents/dings/marks, and track your travels. All by a private company, who then sells access to that data to law enforcement.
FLOCK says the data is only stored for 30 days. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you . . .
The collective information problem is a significant one. Just checking tags to collect tolls or those running stop signs, is one thing, but tying that in with a vast network who tracks your daily travels, and keeps a record of your political/social leanings via bumper sticker, or noting which protests/meetings you go to, etc. It’s gets Orwellian fast.
They’re now also storing the IMEI and other identifying information of any cell phone in the car, and the bluetooth IDs of any bluetooth device (so your bluetooth headphones/earbuds for example).
So they’re no longer just tracking cars, they’re tracking humans as well, directly.
The monitoring capability being built into new cars that determines if the car thinks the person in the driver’s seat is not capable of driving is another aspect of this. Of course reported back to TPTB just like location, speed, etc.
There is a growing movement (about 2-3 years too soon dammit) of people deciding to stay away from newer cars. Looking for daily driver cars up to maybe 2010, fix them up and drive them till you can’t fix them (parts availability, mainly electronics), or mid ’60s to ’80s cars to make ‘forever’ cars. Relatively easy to work on, all analog, good parts availability if you pick popular makes, and since they were designed after the interstate highway system existed they are very capable of handling all reasonable road driving requirements.
I don’t have room for another car now or I’d have already purchased one to go along with the ’71 Challenger in the garage (which is not yet drivable but I’m working on it). Those mid ’60s, ’70s, ’80s cars are already seeing price hikes due to increased interest.
Interestingly there have been a lot of salvage yard fires in the last couple of years. Speculation, could be insurance fraud, or could be someone not wanting those parts to be available to keep other cars on the road; the former is just life, the latter ties in with attempts in several states to pass laws removing vehicles older than a certain age (2010 recently) from the road, or taxing them extra, or restricting them to occasional use or to/from car shows.
This is another issue included in the needs described by your Nation of Riflemen T-shirt.
Are these T shirts available? I regret not buying several