Yeah, I Don’t Buy It

Here’s a piece about former-AG Blondie and the power hierarchy she inherited at the DoJ:

She inherited an agency riddled with holdovers, careerist prosecutors, and institutional muscle memory tuned to the prior regime’s priorities. Her mandate, executed with the cold ferocity of a Florida prosecutor who once stared down the Clintons and lived to tell it, was never to play the long public game of show trials. It was to do the lethal, invisible labor: purge disloyal elements, redirect investigative task forces, shutter the foreign-influence shops that had become political protection rackets, and…most critically…build the factual scaffolding of cases that could survive judicial scrutiny once the political headwinds shifted. That is precisely what she delivered.

And:

First-term chaos taught the lesson: the Senate-confirmed loyalist who survives confirmation must serve as the institutional wrecking ball. The public demands scalps; the law demands airtight cases. Bondi supplied the latter while the former were still being assembled. Those who call her tenure “incompetent” reveal either their ignorance of how the executive branch actually functions or their desire to keep the machine broken so it can never be turned against its former masters. She was never meant to be the permanent face of the Justice Department. She was the architect who laid the rebar and poured the concrete under fire. The structure now stands. The new tenants can furnish it with indictments. That is not failure. That is lethal, disciplined statecraft.

Yeah.  Unfortunately, while I may be ignorant of the big-league governmental powerplays and what have you, I’m not ignorant of the need to look after the interests of ordinary folk, i.e. the voters, who put this lot in power to do all the above, but also to address and right the wrongs perpetrated by the previous bunch of scumbags on ordinary people.

How difficult would it be for the AG to look at, say, the case of Patrick Adamiak — you know, the innocent man railroaded by the ATF (who fall under the DoJ, lest we forget) — and get him out of jail?  Or to withdraw the dozens upon dozens of criminal cases that are still being prosecuted by the DoJ despite the cases being prima facie contrary to both new policy and the law?

Doing both the above may be difficult, but when you are the CEO of an outfit, it’s easy to say to a small task force, “Find all the cases that are being prosecuted but shouldn’t be;  set out a legal (or Constitutional) rationale for nolle prosequi, and I’ll sign the authorizations.”  That’s called “delegation” and it’s what good managers do.

And Pam Bondi didn’t do that.

Let’s just hope that her successor does.

5 comments

  1. “Let’s just hope that her successor does.”

    You’re using that bongo word….never use the bongo word when talking about government action. 😛

  2. Maybe. Would to God it was true. I don’t know anymore.

    Bondi always seemed over her head, but I don’t know what was expected of her.

    Knowing back in 2024, or have seen now about DJT and where he’s taken the country, I would have voted for him twice. But candidly his presidency has been a mixed bag.

    He seems to be one of those executives who likes to create chaos to see who rises to the top, not everyone fits well into that schema. I’m wondering if Bondi, Noem, etc. were the victims of that or not.

    Permanent Washington is a real thing and there’s decades of fuckery to undo. Maybe its more than one term can accomplish.

    Which is why it might be time to take off and nuke the establishment from orbit. Its the only way to make sure.

    However it’s beginning to look like, no matter how distasteful the admission is, that the Mr. Smiths out there do not have the competency or training, to slay the dragon, or build a better dragon (assuming they even WANT to), and just end up adding their bones to an ever growing pile of debris at the front of the cave.

  3. I was luke warm to Bondi and wanted he to be given a chance. She had it and she blew it. Not enough prosecutions. I hope the next AG gets lots of prosecutions.

  4. Pretty much what preussenotto says, and very eloquently, I might add.

    I follow that author on X, and am generally a fan, but when I read that I was extremely skeptical. Your points, Kim, as usual, are spot on.

    At least Bondi was entertaining when appearing before Congress, I’ll give her that.

    JC

  5. I’m sure that sort of thing helps her sleep at night, thinking she did a good job. But yeah, lots of low hanging fruit out there she could have picked to help show voters the right stuff is being done. She didn’t do it, and another year wasted.

Leave a Reply