…what the WHPC shooter’s motives were, according to that lying sack of shit Obama:
“Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night’s shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, it’s incumbent upon us all to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy.”
Yeah, apart from the scrote’s actual published words, that is. The guy could have been carrying a handwritten, signed note in his pocket saying “I want to kill Trump!” and I bet Obama would still have said the same thing, the mealymouthed little motherfucker.
It’s always about “plausible deniability” with these socialist scumbags, isn’t it?
Here’s how I see it. There are two sets of “motives” with all these so-called “random shooters”. The first set of motives is the obvious ones, e.g. what he himself said his motives were.
The second set of motives is what I referred to in last week’s post about the Anarchists’ Playbook:
All these “Ego” Anarchists had responded to the principle of Anarchy — “The Idea”, as Barbara Tuchman described it in the Proud Tower — and its primary focus was on destruction of a state or institution, perpetrated by a lone individual guided by near-insanity or else a mind infused with hatred for “the System” and its leaders.
We’re seeing it now, all over again: Charlie Kirk of Turning Point, assassinated by Tyler Robinson; Brian Thompson of United Healthcare, assassinated by Luigi Mangione, and various other such attempted assassinations.
…and now we can add this latest little turd to the file of “attempted assassinations”.
Barack Obama and his merry little band of Commies can bleat all they want about unknown motives, but they are flat-out lying. They know all too well what these motives are because they’re encouraging them, they and their little lickspittles in the media and academia.
I need to quit now before I’m accused of suggesting that Obama et al. should be dragged up the gallows stairs for being guilty of fomenting insurrection and assassinations.
The real motive was that after a promising start (prestigious school, technical degree, NASA internship) his life had floundered amd he was working as a part time teacher/tutor. This was an attempt to be someone important and thereby turn his life around, the politics of it are actually secondary.
Of course, it is a way of locking in failure in reality. The only way you are a failure in life is to give up and such grand but suicidal actions are giving up with extra steps.
I got curious about which president survived the most assassination attempts, knowing WHPC was at least #3. Turns out it could be 5 or more against Trump, depending on how stringently you define “attempt”. Even the lower number of 3 is more than any other US president (Ford had 2).
Those numbers are small potatoes compared to other world leaders. Per a Business Day article: Castro survived 638 attempts, Zog I of Albania in the 1930’s had 55 (including one where he drew his own weapon and returned fire!), Hitler 42, de Gaulle 21, Arafat 13.
Given that none of these leaders lived in countries noted for having their equivalent of our second amendment and thus had nowhere near the number of firearms in civilian hands as we do, it’s pretty clear that guns aren’t the problem when it comes to political assassinations.
“…Obama et al. should be dragged up the gallows stairs…”
still prefer a guillotine – you can always mount the head on a pike – and this one would still be chattering away
I see no problem with your alternative method.
Let’s not forget George Soros’ millions (billions?) funding all the Astroturfed payed protesters’ demonstrations. That prick needs to be brought before the bar to answer for his exhortation to partisan political violence. The money trail should be easy to track, transparent as it is. He’s behind this as much as anyone is and would be happy as a clam if one of the feeble-minded acolytes actually pulled one off.
“You need to be permanently perfect. We need to be lucky once.”