Latest Posts

Law-Abiding

Gummint, Resistance

From Chris Muir, an excerpt:

So, because I’m a law-abiding type, I won’t use the term “China virus” — I’ll just carry on referring to it as the Chink virus, as I always have.

And when they ban that, I’ll ignore them.  My respect for the law only goes so far, i.e. when the law runs afoul of the Constitution.  As it has, here.

Just for the record:  regardless of any executive order, law or regulation which says otherwise, I’ll call the Chinese-originated Covid-19 “Wuhan” virus whatever the fuck I want.

Not Quite True

Gummint, Resistance

Here’s an interesting situation:

Former congressional candidate Laura Loomer revealed that she was banned from owning a firearm.  Loomer has gained notoriety for being subject to some of the most brazen forms of Big Tech censorship over the past two years.
Her firm nationalist views have made her an easy target for Silicon Valley censors.  She has been banned from social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.  In addition, her ability to do business has been greatly stymied after she was banned from GoFundMe, PayPal, and Venmo.  Chase shut down her ability to do online banking.  To make matters worse, Comcast prevented her campaign from sending texts and emails to voters, while the company donated to her opponent, Lois Frankel in Florida’s 21st congressional district.
This is only the tip of the iceberg as far as the private sector crusade against Loomer goes.  The conservative activist was kicked off Uber and Lyft, on top of being prohibited from using UberEats.

But here’s the fun part:

Despite having no felony or domestic violence convictions and never been declared to be mentally unfit by a judge, Loomer’s name has allegedly been placed in a secret Federal “no buy” list that the FBI keeps. This list is part of the federal government’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).

Of course, that doesn’t mean she can’t own a gun — just that she can’t buy a gun through “regular” channels that require the NICS check before she can take possession.

Here in Texas, by the way, any Concealed Handgun License (CHL) holder can buy a gun through said channels without going through the NICS check, because the state of Texas has already run all the background checks necessary and as far as they’re concerned, that’s that.  If the feds have a beef with the individual that isn’t part of the standard background check, it’s up to them to inform the state.  I don’t know if Floriduh has a similar setup — they should — but my FL Readers will no doubt tell me.

It’s one of the main reasons I got my CHL when I moved to Texas.  I know all the arguments against having a “permit” to enjoy one of my principal Constitutional freedoms, but the way I saw it back then, if it kept the fucking Feddle Gummint out of the process, it was worth it.  And subsequent events have proved me right.

In any event, Miss Loomer doesn’t seem to be a criminal;  her greatest “crime” seems to have been uncovering malfeasance through Project Veritas, and as there’s no actual legal reason not to possess a gun — criminal record, mental incapacitation, etc. — there’s no reason why some friendly citizen of Florida can’t sell or give her a gun for her own protection.

Just sayin’.

Monday Funnies

Funny Stuff

Oh look, it’s Monday again:

Time to thaw the ice with a few funnies.

From Mr. Free Market, about the UK – EU spat about Chinkvirus vaccines: 

And here’s an example (borrowed from Knuckledragger) where your guardian angel would definitely ask Pontius Pilate to hand over the basin:

No man should.

New Day, Same Problem, Different Group

Anarchist thugs, BaconLettuceMayo, Gummint, Law and Order, Marxists, Resistance

So let’s take a look at this new warning from the .dotgov.  Here’s the summary:

The Acting Secretary of Homeland Security has issued a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin due to a heightened threat environment across the United States, which DHS believes will persist in the weeks following the successful Presidential Inauguration.  Information suggests that some ideologically-motivated violent extremists with objections to the exercise of governmental authority and the presidential transition, as well as other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives, could continue to mobilize to incite or commit violence.

What interests me about this diktat  is not that it’s spurious bullshit (it is), but in terms of this language it could have been equally applicable after Trump was elected President.  Let’s parse the thing, to get the parallels to 2017.

  • “Some ideologically-motivated violent extremists”  — Antifa?  Most definitely.
  • “Objections to the exercise of governmental authority and the presidential transition” — Anyone remember the Washington D.C. riots during and after Trump’s inauguration?
  • “Other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives” — that would be the completely false Russian “involvement” of 2017.

All these and more could have been good reasons for Trump to invoke this very kind of action, back in early 2017.

But he didn’t.

Yet because a couple hundred idiots invaded the Capitol, walked off with Nancy Pelosi’s lectern and sat behind her desk, now it’s Defcon-3 and BOLOs for “terrorists”?  Just a reminder:  the “insurgents” who broke into the Capitol weren’t carrying weapons, didn’t throw Molotov cocktails around in the streets or public places, didn’t burn and pillage shops and office buildings, and didn’t beat up innocent people in the streets.  Even the ones arrested were released within hours, and if any effort was made to identify and charge the instigators of said riots, I don’t remember it and nothing ever came of it if there was such an effort.

Also, I don’t recall any of the 2021 “ringleaders” actually saying things like Black Lives Matter’s co-founder Patrisse Cullors, who said in 2015 that she and her fellow organizers are “trained Marxists”.

So which group is more likely to want to violently overthrow our republican form of government:  the “Proud Boys” / Trumpist conservatives or BLM / Antifa?

Anyone who suggests the conservatives, I would suggest, is the enemy of the United States and should be the ones targeted by the National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin of January 27, 2021 — because if ever there is a “false narrative”, it’s the one contained in the bulletin’s summary at the top of this post.

It’s an age-old tactic of the Left:  accuse your opponents of doing what you’re doing, or plan to do.

Essential Ingredient

Music

From Longtime Reader Sean F comes this letter:

I have a question that has been nagging me. Why do I like this fairly obscure and modern group?  They’re only three, which is fine (e.g. Police).  They start off like the Ramones and suddenly they get Who-like – especially the drummer and bass.  Is it the syncopation, unusual tempos (which are Zappa – like)?  Or are they just plain good musicians?  They caught my ear.  An opinion please, if you have time.  I chose this video because it’s live, you can see them all as they interact as well as their individual performances in a good light.  Of course the studio stuff I first heard is MUCH tighter.  But what is a band if not live?

Frankly, I couldn’t stand the thing, and my response to Sean was somewhat dismissive of both band and song:

Garage band.  Not my thing.  For a 3-piece to work, you need a monster bassist — John Entwhistle (The Who), John Paul Jones (Zep), Mel Schacher (Grand Funk), Jack Bruce (Cream) etc. — otherwise it’s just thin noise.

The longer answer — hence this post — is that if you’re going to have a three-piece rock band, each member of the band has to work really hard and be really good at their job, most especially the rhythm section of bass and drums.   Ergo:

  • John Entwhistle + Keith Moon (The Who)
  • John Paul Jones + John Bonham (Zep)
  • Mel Schacher + Don Brewer (Grand Funk)
  • Jack Bruce + Ginger Baker (Cream)
  • Geddy Lee + Neil Peart (Rush)
  • Sting + Stewart Copeland (The Police)

Honestly — and this is not just because I’m a bassist — I think a trio’s bass guitarist has to be every bit as good as or even better than the lead guitarist, because otherwise the band is going to sound like a garage band, forever.  (And, in full disclosure, it’s why I never ever played in a rock 3-piece, because I was completely incompetent under those circumstances.  A piano/bass/drums trio playing old standards at a dinner club?  Lovely, anytime.  Trying to play Zep or Rush-type music?  No chance.)

There’s a simple reason why in the above list I put The Who’s Entwhistle (“Ox” or “Thunderfingers”) at the very top:  because he is quite simply, one of the best if not the best bass guitarist of all time.

It’s not just that Ox played bass guitar better or more differently than his contemporaries way back in the 1960s;  it’s that his technique is still the equal or better of any bassist who’s come along since.  And we all know it.  Even virtuosos like Chris Squire of Yes and Billy Sheehan of Mr. Big, when hearing Entwhistle’s name, shrug and say, “Just the best.”

And here’s my problem:  I loathe The Who’s music.  It is quite simply noise to my ears, and I have never listened to more than one of their songs at a time (except for Tommy, which was a studio album anyway) because I can’t get past Keith Moon’s seemingly-random thrashing away at his drum kit, Roger Daltrey’s screeching vocals and Pete Townsend’s flailing guitar pyrotechnics just to get into Entwhistle’s brilliant bass playing.  (By Townsend’s own admission, The Who were four soloists all playing at the same time.)

But if you can isolate his part and mute all the other shit going on, it is truly astonishing — and when you listen to this rendition of Won’t Get Fooled Again, you’ll see exactly what I mean (skip to 1:10 to avoid the pointless silence of the setup, and quit at 8:50).

And that, folks, is why his nickname was “Thunderfingers”.

The same is true of Zeppelin’s John Paul Jones.  Jones is a far more melodic bassist, which is no small part of Zep’s monumental sound — come on, you’ve got Bonzo on drums and Page on lead, how much more do you need?  Here’s an excellent overview of his technique, with the killer quote:  “He stays out of the way, which is what every good bassist should do.”  Like, for example, John Deacon of Queen — another lovely bassist in a three-piece (most of the time) — who with drummer Roger Taylor provided a rock-solid foundation for Freddie Mercury’s towering showmanship talent and Brian May’s soaring lead guitar.

That’s the kind of skill a bassist has to bring to the party in a rock trio, and that’s the reason why Dinosaur Pile-up sounds like a garage band.  Their bassist is okay, but he needs to be better.  (Pro tip:  he’s playing his bass slung too low, which is why his style is fatally cramped and stiff:  anatomically, your wrist cannot bend that far around and still maintain dexterity in the fingers.  Look where John Entwhistle carries his bass, for example:  the neck is high up.  Bill Wyman of the Stones — another underappreciated but stellar bassist — played his guitar the same way.)  Oh, and by the way:  Pile-up’s songs suck.  They sound like pieces that wouldn’t even be considered for the B-side of a 7″ single record, back when I were a lad.

I could talk about this stuff all day, but you guys need to get on with your weekends.  Till next Saturday.