Kruiser went a little nuts yesterday, talking about evil Democrats:
The most prominent people in the Democratic Party in 2026 are filth. They are all mentally unstable pathological liars who don’t deserve things like the benefit of the doubt in any situation, bipartisan overtures, or the presumption that they’re not inherently evil.
Now when I say “nuts”, I mean nuts — for him. (For me, that’s just a mild-mannered dissertation.)
He then backs off a little by saying NADALT:
I would like to make it clear that I don’t believe that all Democrats are this way. The party has unfortunately been hijacked by a bunch of loudmouth coastal lunatics who, in my less-than-humble opinion, have irreparably damaged the brand and political relations in this country. That’s right, I don’t think that there is an antidote to the poison that they’ve injected into the American political conversation and I think that anyone who does is hopelessly naive.
The relatively normal Democrats who live in flyover country need to find a way to assert themselves — ballot box, anyone? — and make it clear that paste-eating morons like Hakeem Jefferies and Chuck Schumer are not at all representative of them. They are running out of time to make this case. It won’t cure the aforementioned poison if they do, but it might mitigate its effects. That really is the best that I can hope for, anyway.
I’m heartily sick of hearing that there are “moderate” Democrats. There aren’t. “Moderate Democrats” (in historical terms) are now moderate Republicans, which is why Flyover Country is massively Republican. Those moderate Democrats looked at what their party had become and said, “Uh…no.” Now they either vote Republican or sit out the elections.
If they don’t, and pull the straight-D lever on Election Day, then they’re no better than the loony Lefties, because by pulling that lever, they’re enabling the actual filth to continue being filthy.
My suggestion for the filthy:
Yeah, it’s a euphemism. After all, that’s what they’d do to us, given the opportunity.
Remember Cambodia?
Those weren’t conservative Cambodians pulling the triggers.
Same in Nazi Germany. It was socialists running the extermination camps, no matter what revisionists say who claim that “they weren’t communists, therefore they were far right extremists” or things of that nature.
Or the Soviet Gulag or its simulacrums in other countries in the Soviet sphere of influence.
Or the Chinese and North Korean prison camps.
The list goes on and on.
Effectively one of the very few countries that weren’t socialist at the time to do such things were the French, Spanish, and British in their colonial empires, notably the British camps in South Africa during the Boer wars in which many people died of conditions very similar to what the Khmer Rouge did in Cambodia.