Science

Finally, an academic study that keeps us abreast of things:

Scientists have uncovered why women’s breasts are so large compared to other animals.

You all know what’s coming next, right?

Color, you say?  Oh, why not…

And finally, a couple of more recent vintage:

I know, I know:  it’s been a shamefully long time since we saw la bella  Sophia on this here back porch of mine.  I apologize for this egregious omission.

…and oh yeah, about that scientific reason why wimmen’s breasteses are so gloriously abundant:

According to a team from the University of Oulu, Finland, breasts may have evolved to help newborns. Human breasts sit at an elevated temperature, protecting a newborn from hypothermia. What’s more, the size and shape of the breast allows for broad contact surface – enhancing the heat transfer from mother to child.

And I always thought it was to help keep men excited and wanting to procreate.  Silly me.

8 comments

  1. I don’t know about the science but I’m available to thoroughly review the data. It is for science after all.

    We need some “below the fold” data to review.

  2. I’m 77, a product of the 50’s and 60’s. As a kid I crushed on Annette Funicello, in my teens it was Suzanne Pleshette and Diana Rigg. Sometime in my late teens I saw a movie with Sophia Loren on TV. I have no recollection of the movie but Sophia played a barefoot peasant woman, looking like the 3rd colorized picture you have posted. My desire for that woman was more overwhelming than anything else I’ve ever felt. I would still say that Sophia in her 40’s and 50’s was perfection.

  3. Literally she is #1 in my book has been since I was young man some 50years ago #2 Jayne Mansfield sorry to say but Monroe was #3

  4. Kim maybe one day it’s either Novak or Martha Hyer @ #4 leaning Hyer nice spread wold be Nice!

Comments are closed.