This from our friends at PSA:

Whoa… a full-size Kimber 1911 for $500? Get ’em while they’re there. (It’s a Good Thing — I guess — that my 1911 shelf is full, so to speak…)
Not just the guns, but all the stuff that goes with them
This from our friends at PSA:

Whoa… a full-size Kimber 1911 for $500? Get ’em while they’re there. (It’s a Good Thing — I guess — that my 1911 shelf is full, so to speak…)
So the oleaginous CalGov Gavin Newsom went on some podcast last week in Tennessee. During a discussion wherein the Marxist toad claimed to be a supporter of the Second Amendment (lol), the podcaster presented him with a gift: a SIG 365 pistol.
From PSA:

Just a minute here:
ROSE GOLD?

Ever get that feeling that you’re no longer in their target market?
And by the way: at that price, I expect it to be at least 18-karat.
[exit, shaking head]
…in the mail from Reader Glen D:
“If for any reason you were unable to carry your beloved 1911 — or any 1911 and derivatives — what pistol (not revolver) would you choose to carry, and why?”
Just the thought makes me shiver with dread, with ghastly options of striker-fired Mattel-looking things chambered in 9mm Europellet (most of the market nowadays it seems [sigh] ), or Glocks [shudder] or things equally foul like Heckler & Koch, who hate me (and everybody else).
And seeing as Foul Glen has removed my immediate alternative — a revolver — I am forced to consider another semi-auto pistol in something like a decent caliber. But which one?
I’m not going to bore you with the details of my search, because I ended up in several rabbit warrens’ worth of searches. Believe it or not, I’d never even considered a carry gun alternative outside the 1911 universe before. I mean, Kimber, Ed Brown, none of that?
But good grief, modern guns are ugly, in all sorts of ways, even if they (mostly) function as specified. And while there are quite a few choices, most have short barrels (less than the 1911’s 5″), like the Kahr P45:

…which I actually really like, by the way, because I think the Kahr mechanics are actually better than Glock’s.
Anyway, I ended up with the SIG 220 in (of course) .45 ACP. Yeah, I know, double action rubbish and square, blocky-looking monstrosity, but these would be the times I’d have to live in [whimper].
Anyway, at least the P220 comes in several flavors. This one’s the “Elite”:

“Elite”, my aching African-American ass, it’s fugly.
Let’s look at some more. This is the [consults notes] “X-Six II PCC”:

…and it’s quite fetching — redeemed by the grips, actually — but of course, SIG doesn’t make it anymore, so I’d have to find a second-hand one.
Okay, then there’s the “Alloy Stainless”:

…which is also quite nice-looking [yikes]; but guess what? it too isn’t available anymore, at least not at the several retail websites I consulted.
Once more, with feeling. This is the “220R-45-XTM” (try saying that after a couple of gins), and it’s sorta-okay:

But still… ugh.
On we go. Here’s the “Super Match”:

…okay, this one is a lot more like it, and it’s at least single-action-only (SAO) like the 1911.
This would be my non-1911 choice.
Ummmmm…

FFS
Even at that price, I might be tempted — but I very much doubt that the SIG’s single-action trigger is on a par with any 1911, let alone mine.
To Reader Glen: I hope you’re satisfied. You bastard.
Hitchcock45 chooses his favorite child.
Among those beauties he had on that buckskin-covered table, I’m not sure I could have made a choice.
And for what it’s worth, I only half-agree with his final choice, despite it being chambered for my favorite cartridge. Out of that particular group, I could have narrowed it down to (maybe) four… and then killed myself.
Ooooh baby:

First, what they are (i.e. via Gun Jesus, thankee Ian), and then one is brought back to life, with some shooty goodness at the end.
Of every sub-machine gun ever made, this might be the only one that could entice me to hassle with all the NFA bollocks.