Well now, isn’t that special?
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) went on a tirade, during which he appeared to say that citizens would be justified in shooting ICE agents.
“But what is really the major problem in this country today is the fascism in our streets, the attacks on American citizens by masked hoodlums,” Nadler began. “If you were attacked by a masked person, you might think you were being kidnapped. You’d be justified in shooting the person to protect yourself.”
It has long been established that ICE agents wear masks because they are under threat of the radical left identifying and doxxing them. On top of that, even masked ICE agents are clearly identifiable as federal agents every single time. There is no need to suggest that it would be justified to shoot ICE agents.
“But we see people being shot, for what? For driving a car?” Nadler added.
Here we go. Throw in a few blatant untruths or careful elisions — that would be “attacked by a masked person [wearing a clearly-identifiable law enforcement uniform]” and “being shot for driving a car [at people wearing clearly-identifiable law enforcement uniforms]” — and guess what? According to this Nadler asshole, “You’d be justified at shooting the person to protect yourself.”
Yes. Let’s see how that plays out in a courtroom, shall we?
But what the hell, if that fat fuck Nadler can say what he said, then I’ll say this:
I hope that in these specious cases of self-defense, the perpetrators never make it as far as the courtroom, but end up lying in a pool of their own blood right there in the streets, shot dead by law enforcement.
Enough, as they say, is enough. The Left seems eager for a crowd of martyrs to further their little anti-ICE / anti-Trump PR campaign; may be it’s time we gave them what they want, in spades.