Piling On

Architecture

I don’t know how much more of this I can stand:

The White House on Tuesday reportedly fired members of Washington, D.C.’s Commission of Fine Arts, which advises on architectural developments in the capital, including the White House.

The White House has fired all six commission members who were installed under former President Joe Biden, and whose terms were expected to end in 2028.

“We are preparing to appoint a new slate of members to the commission that are more aligned with President Trump’s America First Policies,” a White House official told The Hill.

So… does this mean no more government buildings that look like this?

Fire away, then.

5 comments

  1. who ever designed that building should be relieved of their credentials.

    Neil Boortz had an accurate observation for when he’s looking for a municipal building. He would look for an ugly building with an ugly sculpture in front of it. Bingo. There’s city hall etc

  2. Tucker Carlson mentioned this in one of his whatever’s (podcast/speeches/interviews), that we don’t build beautiful buildings anymore, and haven’t since the 50’s.

    I’ve noticed the same thing. I can understand bidnezz and the concrete/steel/glass boxes that get put up to house the workforce, because its cheap & easy (relatively). But Public buildings seem to have spared no expense on making them as hideous and ugly as possible.

    So Tucker is right, and if I remember correctly, has the same conclusion that I had. Its because we’re communists now (de facto if not de jure) so we build communist looking structures. A world run by ants would have every building look like an ant hill.

    1. those museums should have been shaped like a giant mud hut and a teepee or wigwam respectively.

      Are there table games and slot machines at the Indian museum?

Comments are closed.