Yesterday, in the great state of Texas, I filled my tank at Kroger’s in-house gas station, and paid $1.86 per gallon.
Granted, some of this was via a discount through Kroger’s points program, but I’ll take it any way I can.
I think I’ll pop over to New Wife’s workplace and get her car filled as well. Maybe take a few jerrycans along for the ride.
And then I’ll swing by the range, because Murka.
[Al Pacino voice] Just when I thought I’d got out, they pull me right back in [/Pacino] with this little offer:
And yes I know, I already have the .357 Mag need, shall we say, extremely well covered.
But a new 6″ stainless Python for under a grand? Damn this poverty…
[exit, sobbing]
As I was wandering along the Gunny Trail, I happened upon this new thing:
It’s from Henry Rifles, and they’ve apparently created a new department called “Special Products Division” (SPD). This particular model is known as the HUSH line.
“Why ‘HUSH’, Kim?”
Thought you’d never ask.
Long Time Readers will be all too aware of my antipathy towards plastic stocks, and especially so when used on classic rifles like Murka’s own lever action repeater.
I have to say, though, that this one’s not that horrible when there’s a suppressor attached (although how well a suppressor is going to work on the booming .45-70 Govt cartridge remains to be seen).
Let’s just say that when suppressors are freed from the stupid red tape and registration nonsense (not to mention the average cop’s hostile attitude towards them), I would be tempted — not towards a .45-70 Govt chambering (as pictured), but certainly the .357 Mag model — and certainly still more if I were to shoot the Hornady Critical Defense 110gr light loads — which achieve just over 1,000 fps out of a 4″ revolver… now imagine them emerging from that 24″ barrel, suppressed.
Excuse me, I need to take a quick cold shower.
Sorry. Anyway, I’m not saying I’m going to become a Plastic Fantastic fanboi anytime soon. But there’s just something about that HUSH rifle that intrigues me.
Being Henry and Made In The USA, these rifles are gonna be spendy, my guess in the almost-two grand area, but these are the times we live in.
Ask me again why I love the Swedish M96 Mauser in 6.5x55mm… in the hands of Henry Chan.
…or the model (M/41B) actually used in the video:
Of all the rifles I’ve let go in my life, this one ranks near or if not actually at the top.
And Henry’s post-range commentary parallels my own thoughts on the subject, precisely.
Incidentally, viz. his earlier comments on the Lee-Enfield counterpart, Henry shooting the the No.4 MkI (T) can be seen here.
For purposes unknown (LOL), Friend & Reader JC in PA sends me this link about a gun:
Of course, there’s a lot to like about this gun (it’s a 1911, for starters): Novak-style sights, lightweight hammer, beavertail grip (hammer bite, for the alleviation of), to mention just some.
For me, the flies in this lovely ointment are the extruded grip safety (unnecessary and a massive irritant in an extended range session) and of course the fact that it’s chambered for the Europellet.
Nevertheless, I think it’s a Good Thing (albeit not for me and in any event, I own a sufficiency of 1911s, and properly chambered withal).
Some might ask: Why not just use a Browning-type SA-35 (High Power), if one wants to use a John Moses Browning-designed gun?
There’s no reason not to, of course; as any fule kno, I yield to no man in my love of the High Power (despite its Europellet chambering).
If one is going to go the Euro way and use the 9mm Parabellum, then both are sound choices — the 1911’s shorter barrel may even make it more portable than the full-size High Power.
The problem, however, is that deciding on the 9mm does open up the choice of gun, bigly. Sticking with all-steel construction, there’s the CZ 75 series (e.g. the compact):
…not to mention the full-size SIG P210 (a longtime favorite of mine):
…and of course, the Beretta line (e.g. the 92X Performance):
…to mention but some.
Once you go completely over to the Dark Side and espouse such filth as the plastic guns, of course, the choice expands exponentially, and this post has gone on long enough already.
So thanks, JC; but I’ll be sticking to my beloved 1911 .45 ACP guns. If ever I do want to downsize, I’ll step down to the short-barreled Combat Commander type:
…but that’s as far as I’ll go.
Longtime Readers will be familiar with my affection for Browning’s Buckmark .22 pistol, she of the wonderful trigger and reliable feeding. And excellent accuracy… well, except in my hands.
I used to be able to shoot the Buckmark acceptably well, but as old age has buggered my eyes up horribly (stop me if this is familiar to y’all), so has my accuracy suffered. Of course it’s not the gun: I’ve owned (counting on fingers) five of the things over the years, and I’ve always been able to make the cans pop and dance, so to speak.
Now? I’d be lucky to hit the inside of a room.
So I’ve had to go from this light, sleek little beauty:
…to this (much) heavier, ungainly-looking thing:
Accuracy? I’ll let you know next week, after I’ve been to the range and zeroed the dotty thingamajig in.