Circling The Drain

Wow, nobody (except for the Terminally Stupid) could have seen this coming:

Japanese automotive giant Honda is reassessing its strategy for electric vehicles as it navigates challenges stemming from the high costs of EV development, flattening EV demand, and the impact of U.S. tariffs.

In the first quarter of its 2025-2026 fiscal year (April 1 to June 30, 2025), Honda took a one-time charge of ¥113.4 billion (~$780 million) related to its EV-related troubles. In total, the impact of the EV charge and its exposure to tariffs took a toll on Honda’s operating profit during the quarter, as earnings fell to ¥244.1 billion (~$1.69 billion) from ¥484.7 billion (~$3.35 billion) just one year ago.

Yeah… who else thought that the EV industry would fail without massive government subsidies / Green-based regulation?

Well, yes.

A Matter Of Privacy

This silly situation got me thinking — it’s about a mother rifling through her 17-year-old daughter’s handbag, and finding the morning-after pill — all about the whole topic of privacy and personal space.

Am I the only man in the world who, if his wife asks hims to “get it out of my purse”, just hands her the bag to get whatever it is out for herself?

If ever there’s an article which exemplifies the concept of “private space”, it’s a woman’s handbag.  When I’m asked why I didn’t just look in the bag, I usually make a joke of it, saying things like:  “There’s things with teeth in there!”

It’s not that I’m afraid of what I’ll find in there — I doubt very much whether there’s anything in there that could upset me — but it really is a concern for my wife’s privacy.

Everyone needs a private space.  It’s not necessarily a space that might harbor something that the owner doesn’t want anyone else to see, although it very well might be;  but there’s a concept involved which I think should be respected at all costs.

There’s another old saying that covers this:  if you invade someone’s privacy, don’t be shocked or angered by what you may find.

My old friend Patterson once told me how his wife was always asking him, “What are you thinking about?”  and he, quite understandably, took umbrage at her impertinence.  “For fuck’s sake,” he expostulated to me, “are there no parts of my life that she doesn’t want to examine or look over?”  Anyway, the next time she asked him that intrusive question, his response was epic:  “I was just thinking about how I’d spend the insurance money if you died.”  And when she got upset, his response was equally cutting:  “Do you just want me to lie to you?”  End of discussion, and much later, end of marriage (his second or third, I don’t remember).

I remember once reading about a guy who got pissed off when he discovered his wife going over his workshop, opening cupboards and looking into his toolbox.  And when he confronted her — “What the fuck did you think you’d find?” — his wife couldn’t understand his anger, because she had no clue about how men want their privacy kept sacrosanct.

Here’s the thing.  We men are evil fuckers.  In every man, there’s a quiet, secret space which harbors impure thoughts, impure activities and pathological impulses.  Sometimes, to be sure, those secret spaces include nefarious activities:  infidelity, criminality, shameful behavior, whatever.  Whether it’s a phone, a hiding place or a secret credit card / bank account, it doesn’t matter;  they exist.

The point is that even if that secret space doesn’t involve something nefarious, it’s still private and we will guard it zealously.  Think of it as a personal manifestation of the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment:  the right to privacy being the ability of an individual to keep their personal information and private life out of the public domain.  And in this case, “public” doesn’t just mean “the public”;  it means everyone else in the fucking world, including wives, children and parents.

So yeah, our concerned mother in the above article was being snoopy — even though I think she had every right to be concerned about her not-yet-adult daughter — but it’s quite understandable that her daughter would feel utterly betrayed by the invasion of her privacy, nevertheless.

Getting The Blues

Okay, I never expected to see this:

Swarms of pigs have been found with neon blue skin after ingesting life-threatening pesticides.  

The electric blue-skinned hogs were first reported in Monterey County, California in March when trapper, Dan Burton, discovered several wild pigs with blue fat and muscle.  He told LA Times: “It’s wild. I’m not talking about a little blue. I’m talking about neon blue, blueberry blue.”

The feral swine are thought to have ingested the rat poison from dyed bait or feeding off other infected species.

Wow.  Assuming that all the above is true and not some cock-and-bull story cooked up by The Usual Suspects, I’m not at all sure how to comment.

I’ve never supported using poisoned bait to keep vermin under control, for the same reason that I don’t support fishing with explosives:  a bullet has one intended target, whereas both explosives and poison are simply labeled “To Whom It May Concern” — i.e. it’s indiscriminate targeting.

However:  there are two known facts extant.  The first is that wild pigs are becoming a pest on a national scale.  In Texas, you don’t need a permit to hunt them, and when you do there’s no bag limit, wild pigs being regarded as vermin.  Texas farmers not only allow pig-hunters on their property, they welcome them.

The second fact is that the state of California has the same regard for hunters as landowners have for vermin.  California, more than almost any other state, hamstrings the practice of hunting with all sorts of nonsensical regulations, even in the remotest parts of the state.  So landowners, not wanting to draw attention from the state’s feral bureaucrats and law enforcement, simply use other means to control the population — such as poison.

I’m not saying I agree with the practice, but I sure as hell understand it.

But that pic is still some kind of spooky, innit?

News Roundup

And on to DaNooz:


...”While it is almost certainly impossible in reality” tells you all you need to know.


...California, Washington and Oregon most likely to be affected, huh?  Hmmm… maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to pooh-pooh it.


...big deal;  we already have them here in Texas, no nukes needed.


...oh, why not? They’ve already made me somewhat allergic to bioethicists — “allergic” in the sense that I want to shoot these particular ones in the face.


...someone remind me:  when was the last time Germans felt this way?  Oh, that’s right:  back in the 1930s and early -40s.

From the Golden Shower State:


...so we’ll give him a fair trial, and then hang him.  Oh, wait...
#California

From the Dept. of Education:


...nothing will happen to the teacher.
#Chicago #TeachersUnion

Our Mother Of The Year Award:


...and a pic of Mommie Dearest should explain it all:

In International Crime News:


...didn’t look under the sofa cushions, eh?

In Sports News:


...heheheh:  “dildo pandemic Oh, and a quick correction:  there’s only one “star” in the WNBA, and it wasn’t Caitlin Clark who was hit by the dildo.

And in Not-So-Entertaining News:


...should have ended about 18 years ago, when he stopped being funny.

And now, the ever-popular and ever-link-free 

 

  ...they’re gay?

And as we follow   over to the golf course:

Paige Spiranac’s skintight golf outfit makes fans beg ‘to play a round’ with her 
...here’s a video, and in case you’ve forgotten who we’re talking about:

So let’s take a hard drive out of the news.

Miss America

I have to say that I’ve been somewhat dismissive of young Sydney Sweeney before (here and here, scroll down to see).

But then came the American Eagle jeans/genes commercial:

…which had this effect on the Left:


(because rayyyycisssm or something)

…and which had an even-more interesting effect on American Eagle’s stock price:

American Eagle’s stock soared 20 percent this week, sending its market value close to $400 million after a viral backlash from the Left over its “good jeans” ad featuring actress Sydney Sweeney. The iconic American retailer got a significant sales boost after President Donald Trump publicly praised Sweeney, following revelations that she’s a registered Republican.

Wait…she’s a Republican?  Hubba hubba.

Then, just to add to the good stuff, it turns out that young Sydney restores classic cars:

Sydney Sweeney is far from your typical Hollywood star. With global fame and expensive roles under her belt, she’s invested much of that into restoring classic Fords. Like her cherry‑red 1969 Bronco and a Brittany Blue ’65 Mustang dubbed Britney. Unlike most celebrity car stories, hers begins with a floor jack, welding torch, and grease‑caked knuckles. Growing up in a mechanic family in Spokane taught her to dismantle an axle before memorizing lines. She documents these builds on TikTok as Syd’s Garage, blending Hollywood glam with wrench turns.

Sweeny’s not stopping at two Fords. She also owns a 1956 Ford F100, gifted by her grandfather, with original patina and plans for a mild restoration, as well as a Sky‑Blue Fiat 500 Jolly, acquired for $68,500.

What’s most compelling is how she marries Hollywood charm with shop-floor humility. She could easily pay others to source chrome parts, but instead she makes tools vintage co-stars: torque wrenches, sanders, and degreasers. With 1.8 million TikTok followers, she’s not playing dress-up but instead teaching thousands to pick up a socket and learn.

Sweeney’s garage is louder than any red carpet, and her fame is fueled by fuel injectors and vintage shine. She’s not preserving history. She’s reviving it with her own two hands, proving that classic muscle cars, and women, can roar in harmony.

Anyone getting interested by now?  Republican, hot, works on classic cars… what could possibly make her more attractive?

Well, there’s this.

Yup, the young lady is a shooter, and a good one (judging by her times and accuracy).

As one commenter put it, that moves her up from a 10 to a 10,000.

Not being much of a jeans aficionado, I don’t know if American Eagle jeans are any good;  but if they are, be my guest — because the better the company does, the more it’ll make liberal heads explode.

Do it for Sydney.

Helping Hand

In my post last week which pooh-poohed the alarm about relative salaries, I took a couple of wild-ass guesses as to the “disparities” between the 1940s to the 2020s.  I did confess that the numbers were made up — I was trying to make a point that whereas everyday life was affordable back then, even on a modest salary, it certainly isn’t today, at almost any non-Bezos salary.

Helpful Reader Alex S. has some thoughts, and some analysis:

Hi Kim,
It’s much worse:

Basket Comparison: 1940 vs 2025 (USA Averages; all values in USD; % shows increase from 1940 to 2025)

Category                               | 1940 Price     | 2025 Price  | % Increase
————————————–|—————-|—————-|————
Groceries (/month, fam. of 4)  | $25            | $1,200         | 4700%
Gasoline (per gallon)               | $0.18         | $3.70           | 1955%
Electricity (per kWh)                | $0.04         | $0.17           | 325%
Apart. Mothly (1BR, urban)       | $27            | $1,450         | 5269%
Housing Cost (per sq. ft)          | $30            | $225            | 650%
Bourbon Whiskey (750ml)        | $2              | $30              | 1400%
Large Automobile                    | $850           | $50,000       | 5775%
College Tuition (public, annual)  | $150           | $11,000       | 7233%

Notes on Sources and Assumptions
Groceries: Based on USDA food plans and CPI data.
Gasoline: 1940 was ~$0.18/gal; 2025 national average is around $3.70/gal.
Electricity: National average per kWh, adjusted to residential use.
Apartment Rent: 1940 rent: BLS; 2025 rent: Zillow/National Rent Index.
Housing Cost per Sq.Ft: Includes median new home sales prices.
Bourbon: Average shelf bourbon adjusted for inflation and brand quality parity.
Automobile: 1940 was full-size sedans like Buick; 2025 equivalent is a full-size SUV or sedan (e.g., Chevy Tahoe or Toyota Avalon).
College Tuition: In-state tuition at public universities (e.g., UCLA, UGA, etc.).

Now to be fair, one should probably index the dollars to a fixed year, e.g. 1985 (the most common index in comparisons of this nature), but the point is still very valid.

And it sucks.