The problem with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) is that he’s a firm believer in this Constitution Nostra. In a way, he’s like the Constitution Goblin that sits on our shoulder whispering, “Show me where in the Constitution it says you can do that”.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed President Donald Trump’s military strikes against suspected drug boats were not legal.
Host Kristen Welker said, “President Trump has authorized military strikes against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean, as you know, so far more than 20 people, senator, have been killed in six different strikes. Do you believe that these strikes against these suspected drug boats are legal?”
Paul said, “No, they go against all of our tradition. When you kill someone if you’re not in war, and not in a declared war you really need to know someone’s name, at least. You have to accuse them of something and you have to present evidence. All of these people have been blown up without us knowing their name and without evidence of a crime. For decades and if not centuries when you stop people at sea in international waters or in your own waters you announce that you’re going to board the ship and you’re looking for contraband, smuggling or drugs. This happens every day off of Miami, but we know from Coast Guard statistics that about 25% of the time the Coast Guard boards a ship there are no drugs. So if our policy now is to blow up every ship we suspect or accuse of drug running, that would be a bizarre world in which 25% of the people might be innocent.”
And I agree with him.
In the first place, these are not Venezuelan Navy ships that our boys are sending off to that Big Drydock In The Sky; they’re privately-owned. And yes, they may have been sponsored by that godless Commie VenPres Maduro, but we don’t really know that, do we?
Me, I’d rather have the Navy board a ship when intercepted, and if they find evidence of drugs — like, sacks of cocaine powder in the hold — they should thank the ship’s crew politely, get off the ship… and then blow it the shit out of the water.
I don’t agree with this part of ol’ Rand’s little diatribe, though:
“The other thing about these speed boats is they’re 2,000 miles away from us. If they have drugs they’re probably peddling drugs to one of the islands of Trinidad or Tobago off Venezuela.”
Don’t care where the destination of the drugs may be: la coca is illegal in pretty much every country on earth — oh, and by the way, just because the drugs may be headed for Trinidad or Tobago, that doesn’t mean that those islands are their final destination: they might just be a stop over, en route to the U.S. (and probably are, being just part of the distribution network).
I also suspect that the “25%” of the time statistic is because the drug runners see the USN or USCG ships coming, and dump the contraband overboard — which is fine because whatever, the drugs aren’t going to reach their destination.
I know why The Donald is doing this: it’s to create a negative incentive for drug smuggling, a way to persuade these assholes to find another way to earn a living. It might work; but it’s not legal.
And we’re not (yet) at war with Venezuela, last time I looked, and given the craven nature of Congress as it stands right now, I doubt very much whether they’d give the go-ahead to nuke Caracas, tempting though that prospect might be.
It’s a tough problem, but I’m not sure that bombing ships out in the middle of the ocean is the correct one. Rand Paul doesn’t; and I think in this case, he has the right of it.
I am prepared to hear opinions to the contrary, of course.







