Last Friday I stumbled across this little gem:
So in essence, what you’re saying is that if anyone wants to avoid death by assassination (in this case), they have to be careful of what they say?
There’s a simple word to describe this attitude: terrorism.
And fuck you.
I see that ICE is doing the right thing and deporting the entire family of the Boulder Bomber (who is, lest we forget, an illegal alien). This is a Good Thing.
The wife and children of Egyptian illegal alien Mohamad Soliman, the terrorist who firebombed Americans peacefully walking on the street in downtown Boulder Sunday, have been taken into Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody and will be deported soon. The family is being processed for expedited removal, which allows rapid deportation without a hearing before an immigration court/judge.
I just hope that on the way out, the State Department remembers to revoke any U.S. citizenship that may have resulted from in-country births. (Note: this is one good reason why Trump is attempting to end the “citizenship-by-birth” boondoggle, which hardly exists outside the U.S. anyway.)
A thought occurred to me after that Muslim illegal alien threw firebombs at a bunch of peaceful Jews up in Boulder.
Seeing as these extremist Muzzies (and for that matter, all their non-extremist buddies) are so keen on introducing foreign law principles into the U.S. of A. (#shari’a), their comrades-in-arms (#LeftistFilth) should have no problem with us introducing some other set of foreign legal stuff as well.
I’m thinking here of some Hebraic Law (Old Testament style) along the lines of “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” principles.
Which would mean that this Egyptian fuckwit would be doused with gasoline and set on fire in the public square.
All in favor?
Too harsh? Okay, then…
…or a group affair with his buddies: 
I will entertain alternatives in Comments. Hate speech welcome.
And a final thought: just one bubbeh with a gun could have prevented this whole sorry business.
Via Sarah at Insty’s place, I followed this link and immediately burst into helpless laughter.
“First they came for Mahmoud Khalil, and I said nothing because I thought it was a damn good idea.”
…and it gets better and better as it goes on. If you missed the “Faux Anguish” link, then go there now, and enjoy. Best thing I’ve read in ages.
Cody Balmer, the 38-year-old man arrested for allegedly firebombing the home of Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) over the weekend, hates Jews.
“Balmer called 911 following the attack early Sunday, identified himself by name and told operators Shapiro needs to know he ‘will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people.’ ”
My immediate thought would be to round up this asswipe’s family, then set the lot of them on fire — family first, then him later in the day — because after all, that’s what he had in mind for Shapiro’s family.
Yeah, this kind of shit makes this old atheist go all Old Testament / Hammurabi-like, sue me.
We’ve all seen recently that acolytes of the Left have been vandalizing Tesla cars, destroying Tesla charging points and attempting to damage Tesla dealerships — all because they disapprove of what Tesla founder Elon Musk has been doing to bloated government, or soemthing.
POTUS Trump calls these activities “domestic terrorism” while several people at CNN label them “a protest“.
I just want to see if I’ve got this clear.
So according to CNN: if I were to, say, firebomb Michael Moore’s (empty) house because I strongly disagree with all the things he’s said, that would be just “a protest” ?
What about painting “Lefty Scum” on Chuck Schumer’s car? Also “a protest” ?
How about circulating a bumper sticker like this one?
Would this too be an example of First-Amendment-protected “protest” ?
I’m just trying to understand the ground rules, here.