Back in the days of my very-much misspent yoot, we did the student protest thing not just because of injustice and fighting back against The Man etc., but also because it was a really good place to pick up chicks. And by and large, they were good-looking ones too.
Yeesh. No wonder all the male protesters these days look like effeminate girlymen if not actual homosexualists.
Then again, if I drop the rose-colored spectacles for a moment, I also recall that a lot of the Indignant Womyns back then were kinda like the scolds we see today: uhly, humorless and fanatical.
No man should.
Insty posted this:
…which is funny, in a wry sort of way.
The thing is that the protesters are just blocking commercial sites.
Let’s all wonder how the police would react if the protesters were blocking government offices.
Here’s an interesting one:
A psychology student has been arrested for a hate crime after allegedly hurling anti-Semitic slurs at three Jewish children before spitting on one in Brooklyn last week.
Christina Darling, 21, was arrested on Friday and has been charged with aggravated harassment as a hate crime, endangering the welfare of a child and menacing [behavior].
In the video, the St Francis College student can be seen stomping up to an eight-year-old boy playing with two of his younger siblings – aged seven and two – and launched into an anti-Semitic tirade before spitting on him.
‘Hitler should have killed you all. I’ll kill you and know where you live,’ she yelled.
See, I don’t buy the “hate crime” thing at all, but spitting at someone is classed as assault, and a minor felony, ergo this unpleasant little virago deserves some kind of punishment…
…which, under the reign of World-Emperor Kim would be that she be exiled for one year to live in Israel — Jerusalem, preferably.
The NYGovt could pick up the tab, which would be less than keeping her incarcerated.
Regarding my post about the reinstatement of Comic Con and the pics of costumed chippies, Reader WVHillbilly commented:
“Usually you have women who are six sizes too large to wear a skintight costume parading around like overstuffed sausages..”
You mean like these?
Point taken. However, there are some who use their curves to good advantage:
Nothing too wrong with that.
From Longtime Reader Sean F:
Potty training, no doubt.
All jokes aside, this goes to show that for this bunch, it’s all just a game. Wait till it gets serious.
Over at Taki’s place, Ted Dalrymple takes aim (metaphorically speaking; he’s a Brit) at some total loony university professor:
Professor MacCormack’s book defeated me, not only sapping my will to read further but inducing a state almost of catatonia. It certainly cured me, at least temporarily, of my obsessional desire to finish any book that I have started. Her style made The Critique of Pure Reason seem as light and witty as The Importance of Being Earnest. She appears to think that the English plural of manifesto is manifesti rather than manifestos; I admit that it conjured up in my mind a new Italian dish, gnocchi manifesti.
Open the book at any page and you will find passages that startle by their polysyllabic meaninglessness combined with the utmost crudity. By chance, I opened the book to page 144 and my eye fell on the following:
The multiplicity of becoming-cunt as an assemblage reassembles the tensors upon which it expresses force and by which force is expressed upon its various planes and dimensions.
And Dalrymple notes:
I have known deteriorated schizophrenic patients to speak more sensibly and coherently than this.
No kidding. Let’s take a look at this paragon of literacy, shall we?
…and not in drag:
This Oz bint is, and I quote: “a professor of continental philosophy at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, England” (whatever “continental philosophy” may be). Also, Anglia Ruskin University is not part of Cambridge University, but a separate school with campuses scattered across several towns, Cambridge being but one of them.
One wonders what John Ruskin (after whom it’s named) would think of this example of its academic excellence.