Not just the guns, but all the stuff that goes with them
Saw this SOTI (somewhere on the Internet):
Nice sentiment, but not ambitious enough. Consider these options:
Or, if we’re going to “own them all”, let’s look at some other cartridge options, grouped together for the sake of convenience:
You see, I don’t want anyone to be constrained in their thinking… think big, people. Own them all.
And remember National Ammo Day on November 19th.
Received from CheaperThanDirt.com recently:
File this under “Why You Should Proofread Your Ads Before Sending”
That, or else Savage is expanding their 110 line:
Just in case anyone has forgotten (and shame on you if you did), this coming Monday November 19th will be National Ammo Day — which, given the upcoming transfer of Congressional power to the Socialist Party, makes Ammo Day’s rationale all the more meaningful.
For those who’ve been living on the Planet Manhattan and didn’t get the word, the principle is simple:
Buy one hundred (100) rounds of ammunition or more on November 19th. Corollary: if you eschew factory ammo and roll your own, then buy sufficient powder, primers, casings and bullets to create more ammo — the quantity is up to you — OR buy a brick (500 rounds) or more of .22LR.
That’s it.
The goal of Ammo Day is quite simple: to put a billion additional rounds of ammunition into civilian ownership on a single day.
Make your plans accordingly.
Here’s the gun with which I learned to shoot the .45 ACP cartridge: the Colt Combat Commander Model 70:
Now I’ve said a lot of bad things about Colt (the company) before, but I have to tell you, my Commander was an absolute joy to shoot, and I never had to do anything to improve it. What’s more, it loaded, fired and ejected every possible type of .45 ACP I ever put into it, and within the confines of the shorter 4” barrel, it was as accurate as I could shoot it — which, I have to tell you, wasn’t saying much. In those days, I had no patience, and every handgun shooting session seemed to involve shooting a box of ammo as quickly as possible, then heading off to the rifle range lanes to do the serious stuff, i.e. trying to get five rounds of .308 through a single hole with my Israeli Mauser.
It seemed pointless to me to spend a lot of time at the range trying to coax tiny groups out of a 4” barrel, when most self-defense situations involve distances of less than seven yards and shooting fewer than five rounds — when pin-point accuracy is largely irrelevant, really, as long as all the holes are in a sideplate-sized hole in the center of the target.
But to return to the old days: after shooting off my first thousand rounds of .45 ACP, I could handle the Commander in my sleep, and saw no reason to spend more time than I needed “to keep my eye in”. Ah, the silliness of youth…
To a certain degree, I still have some of that cavalier attitude towards large-caliber handgun shooting, and most especially with a carry gun. Now, though, that’s confined to my backup S&W 637; the 1911, however, always gets a thorough workout.
And here’s the scoop: the smaller 1911 frames like the Combat Commander are a perfect compromise between stopping-power and concealability — for a man. I think that women need something which either tames recoil better (i.e. a larger-frame pistol) or else should shoot a cartridge which has less recoil to start off with. Or both. Like this shiny Combat Commander in 9mm:
And yes, I know there are women who compete in IPSC and all that jive, using full-frame 1911s to shoot .45 ACP. (David also killed Goliath — but that’s not the way to bet.) The stainless Commander fits every bill for the ladies, I think.
As for me: would I use a Commander for my carry piece nowadays? In a heartbeat.
The title isn’t what you think.
The “civil service” is the nickname British Army soldiers gave to the hapless SA-80 bullpup rifle — it doesn’t work and you can’t fire it — during Gulf War One. So bad was the thing that a booming black market for captured Iraqi AK-47s was created because so many of the SA-80s were “lost” during that campaign.
However, after many failed attempts to fix the poxy rifle, it appears that the Brits have finally got the thing right (other than the fact that they had to get the Germans to do the job for them, of course: that whirring sound you hear is of British WWI and WWII field marshals spinning in their graves).
Apparently the SA (now called the SA-80A3) really has been fixed this time, and the Brits plan on fielding it for at least a half-dozen more years. Of course, it still shoots the silly poodleshooter 5.56mm NATO (.223 Rem) cartridge, which the U.S. Army will soon be phasing out because it’s ineffective in any scenario outside an urban one [links to about 5,000 earlier Kim Rants on the topic omitted for reasons of brevity].
Which means the Brits will have to play catch-up, again.
Anyone have any thoughts about the relative merits of these two beauties ? Asking for a friend.
(Pics and prices from Bud’s Guns)