Random Totty Alert

Is it just my imagination, or has there been some prime totty in the news over the past week or so?

Here’s ex-White House PR bomb Hope Hicks:

Nicola Roberts:

Face?  Okay:

Even old Nigella was in the news:

Conservative hottie Lauren Southern, who’s (sadly) quitting politics:

Lindsay Lohan, Train Smash Woman Extraordinaire, looking like Marilyn:

And finally, a blast from my past (she’s my age, and looking sensational), Jenny Agutter:

Good Housekeeping?  Good grief, more like.

Random Carol

And seeing as today’s offerings on this here website seem to be all about sex, why not a pic or two of the current object of my obsession errr crazed stalkings okay desire, Carol Vorderman:

There has been talk recently that Miss Carol has had some errr surgical work done on her (which she adamantly denies, btw).  I think I speak for all red-blooded heterosexual men when I say:  who cares?

150 Years

That’s the combined age, give or take a few years, of Monica Bellucci, Elizabeth Hurley and Salma Hayek.

And if I may say so, it’s a damn good vintage.  Even if it does evoke the start of a joke (“An Italian, a Brit and a Mexican walk into a bar…”).

Oh, another  150 years, you ask?  Why not…

And now, if you’ll excuse me…

Yet Another Difficult Choice

One of my favorite games is one I’ve played before on this blog:  someone offers you a choice between three cars (in mint-original, fully-restored and/or modernized condition, whichever you prefer), which one would you pick?  The rules are:  you can’t ever sell it, so the car’s current market value is irrelevant; and it’s a driver.

For today’s fun, we’re going to feature three ragtop beauties from the mid-1960s (and I’ve tried to match the color so that it doesn’t affect your decision):

1967 Ferrari 275 GT Spider (3.3-liter V-12, 300 hp)

1965 Jaguar E-type Roadster (4.2-liter straight 6*, 265 hp)

1967 Maserati Ghibli Spider (4.7-liter V8, 306 hp)

Go ahead, make your pick in Comments — but show your work.


*Duly corrected, sorry.

/1984

Swimsuit Issues

Ah, shuddup:

But the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue doesn’t care about plus-sized women, athletes, or religious models. It cares about staying relevant while also profiting off men buying a magazine to drool over hot women. These silly claims of empowerment through the swimsuit issue cannot change the fact that pages of sexualized women marketed toward men are inherently sexist, insulting, and gross. No amount of diversity can hide Sports Illustrated Swimsuit’s real problem.

This, after SI put some Muslim totty in a Mohammed-approved bathing suit (see link, I don’t want it on my blog).

I’ve never purchased a SI Swimsuit Issue, nor even paged through one.  (I think SI is a crap magazine, period, so why would its T&A issue be any better?)  So this situation bothers me not, except that Teh Womyns are once again trying to make men’s lives less enjoyable because feminist bullshit.  (When they start on People Magazine because of its annual Sexiest Man Alive feature, I might bother to listen — nah, not even then.)

As for the current brouhaha about Muzzie swimsuits, I think the best response would be to post a pic of a real swimsuit, and to double the effect, one worn by a Jewish  girl:

Swimsuit 2018: Aruba Athletes / Aly Raisman / Aruba 11/11/2017 / X161518 TK4 / Credit: James Macari

My my, young Aly certainly has  grown up since the 2012 Olympics…