Here’s a good question:

Yeah. So, for the donors, the orgs funneling the dollars, and for that matter the recipients of said slush money:

Extreme? I don’t think so… when you consider the alternatives.
Here’s a good question:

Yeah. So, for the donors, the orgs funneling the dollars, and for that matter the recipients of said slush money:

Extreme? I don’t think so… when you consider the alternatives.
Let’s take the lace panties off this pork chop, shall we?
California woman arrested, accused of trafficking weapons for Iranian govt
The lace panties would be the “California woman” appellation. In fact:
On Saturday, 44-year-old Shamim Mafi was detained at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
According to First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, Mafi, a California resident, was charged with brokering deals involving Iranian drones, bombs, and ammunition that were allegedly intended for Sudan.
In addition to the accusations, authorities say records linked her to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security. Court documents indicated that the ministry allegedly provided instructions and funding for her to establish a business in the United States to operate from.
Here’s the pork chop: this Iranian tart is in fact an Iranian government mole, involved in all sorts of subversion and other Fifth-column activities. She’s a “California woman” only in terms of her place of residence — she is apparently a resident alien and not a U.S. citizen — but the term used is just a figleaf to conceal her true nature and activities.
I’m just surprised that One America News used the figleaf in their headline — it’s normally the Left who use such nomenclature in referring, for example, to a criminal rapist illegal immigrant as “a Maryland man”, and so on.
Note to OAN: Stop doing that.
Here’s one guaranteed to make us all feel better:
Dubai police snooped on a private WhatsApp group to snare an airline worker who shared images of a building damaged in the Middle East crisis.
Authorities accessed a closed chat between colleagues, downloaded evidence and then lured the man to a meeting and arrested him.
He is in custody facing charges including publishing information deemed harmful to state interests which carries a maximum sentence of two years.
Radha Stirling, chief executive of Detained in Dubai, said: ‘Dubai Police have now explicitly confirmed they are conducting electronic surveillance operations capable of detecting private WhatsApp messages.
‘Individuals are being tracked, identified, and arrested not for public statements, but for private exchanges between colleagues.
‘Companies like WhatsApp must answer urgent questions about user privacy.
‘If private communications can be detected and used as the basis for arrest by overreaching or hypersensitive states, users worldwide need clarity on how their data is being accessed.’
According to the police report, authorities stated the clip was detected ‘through electronic monitoring operations’.
So much for “privacy” and “end-to-end encryption”. The question — now that the cat’s out of the bag — is quite simple: did the Dubai feds hack into WhatsApp, or did WhatsApp just hand the encryption key over to them?
We all know that in Arab nations, personal freedoms have about as much permanence (and relevance) as an ice cube in the desert when it comes to their governments.
But lest we get all smug and complacent, I’m willing to bet that a similar situation is in place pretty much everywhere — and the United States is no exception.
Ran into this little A.I. video SOTI, and while none of it concerns me — yet — I think there are a couple of things worth noting.
The “12 Guns Being Banned in 2026” are interesting, although none of them fall within my “I Want This Thing In My Gun Safe” parameters, mostly because they are chambered in calibers that don’t interest me (although that new Zastava M70…hmmm), too expensive (e.g. Daniel Defense) or else I’m just not interested in that type of gun (e.g. Tavor 12ga multi-tube shotgun).



However, what does interest me is that the GFW state legislators — all the usual suspects, plus Vermont (!!! WTF?) — have decided that if they can’t ban a gun just because it’s a gun, they’re going to ban it because it’s “military-specific” (like that matters), “common sporting purposes” (ditto), “concealable” (ditto) or, more worryingly, because of various features that they don’t like. In other words, the guns are becoming too efficient and reliable, and only the military should have access to these features (again, bullshit, but it’s what they’re running with).
It’s a long video and both boring and/or irritating (#A.I.narration), but like I said, what it reveals is the ways with which the GFWs are targeting guns. And my Virginia Readers should pay special attention because that’s the direction your state is heading if it’s not there already (ditto Colorado, a.k.a. Eastern California).
Of course, the Second Amendment Foundation will get involved at some point, and maybe a few of these abuses will reach the Supreme Court to have their pee-pees whacked; but that’s leaving our fate in the hands of lawyers, which is always a risky proposition.
However, there may come a time when some guy (or guys) will get sick of all this bullshit and say “Come and get them” to which the state will reply “Challenge accepted” and the whole thing will end in tears. I should point out that this is precisely the outcome these totalitarian bastards are hoping for.
Be careful out there, buy more ammo, and practice a lot. And now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to the range.
Afterthought: I think it’s time I should look at one of those FRT (forced recoil trigger) thingies, just because I suspect that they will soon be a definite target for the GFWs. Which is why I should get one, most probably for the FrankenPoodleShooter.

Likewise, as soon as I can buy a moderator (“silencer”) over the counter without paperwork, that too will be added to the above. Not because I especially want one, but because they don’t want me to have one.
In which some smart guy compares the hard-headed and realistic professionalism of Trump’s foreign policy towards Iran vs. that of the feckless Obama administration.
While then-Secretary of State John Kerry famously treated Iranian negotiators like esteemed colleagues, Vice President JD Vance just treated them like a landlord dealing with a delinquent tenant who thinks he owns the building.
I’d like to think that was Kerry’s underpinning philosophy — simple foolishness and a massive misread of the room — but then I’d have to think that Fuckface’s dealings with Iran didn’t involve in-depth discussions with Barack Traitor Obama, who always had another, more malevolent attitude towards his adopted country.
The fact of the matter is that the Obama administration sold the United States out to Iran — with cash as well as white-glove treatment — and it’s taken us this long to reverse that ghastly policy.
I would urge you all to read this Twatter post. It’s a tad long, but what I say below the fold will make a great deal more sense if you do.