1) “Unexploded World War II bombs hamper efforts to battle massive wildfires rampaging through a German forest” — don’t care; they started it.
2) “Mummified body found in a hoarder’s home ‘belonged to a cat burglar who was executed on the spot after being caught in the act’ ” — I have an alibi. (Oh, sure: like you’ve never thought about doing it.)
3) “Wednesday’s Cascadia Quake A Wake-Up Call For Pacific Northwest: Feared Mammoth 9.0+ Quake A Matter Of When, Not If” — can’t wait.
4) “The eurozone is destined to fail.” — can’t wait, Part II.
5) “State Department is blocking economic aid slated for the Palestinians and is sending it somewhere else!” — about time, too. God-Emperor Trump continues to wow conservatives, this time by shafting those Arab assholes — who don’t deserve anything from us considering their past, present and future behavior.
And your “feelgood” story of the day:
6) “Clueless couple struggled to get pregnant for four years are told by doctor the wife is still a virgin because they were having anal sex” — well, at least the husband got something out of it… but after they figured out what they were doing wrong, she got pregnant, which as any fule kno, is when the sex stops. I know all this sounds unlikely, but let us remember that this happened in China, where anything’s statistically possible in a population of 1.5 billion people.
Yikes, it’s Monday:
And for its antidote:
…and a candidate for Mother Of The Year:
Jesus Wuz Here:
(no, that’s not one of my baby pics)
Finally, some beauty to help you through the week:
OMG it’s Monday:
So here we go:
(I’ve done this.)
…and some Monday beauty:
So why the snow theme for today, you ask?
Because I’m getting sick of summer, is why.
So your weekly antidote follows:
And to round things off, your dose of beauty, Jennifer:
She was in one of my classes at UNT, age about 45 when this pic was taken. Sometimes I miss being a student.
I have written before about how I can get confused by well-known women who either look like each other or who have similar-sounding names (follow the links for a full and ahem scientific explanation).
Here’s another one. There are two well-known women (“well-known” in the pages of the Daily Mail at least) who confuse me utterly — until, that is, I see their picture. They have the same last name (Rose) with first names of Ruby and Demi, respectively, and thus confuse me utterly if I’m just reading text (“Now which one is that?”). An easy difficulty to encounter, I think we can all agree, especially as neither seems to have done anything of note (e.g. won an Oscar, found a cure for cancer or married a member of some royal family).
Once you see pictures of said Roses, however, it becomes a lot easier, because Ruby looks like this:
…while Demi looks quite different:
Of course, to me they both look (and from what I can tell, behave) like prostitutes; but while Ruby actually has a more interesting face, at least Demi isn’t covered with ink:
But it’s all a question of personal preference, of course, and yours may well differ from mine. Right now, all I have to remember is: Ruby = tattoos, Demi = curves, and that’s how I can keep them differentiated.
(By the way, the OCD and Germans [some overlap] will be freaking out that none of the travelers are standing in the official footprints…)